We have a community treasury at ICDevs and I think we could risk some of it on helping vetted folks or organizations get listed.
When I submitted the latest proposal it voted the ICDevs neuron and it cast 34 Million votes. That is not cool. One org shouldn’t have that much influence. We voided the vote and resubmitted without voting(we’ll see how that plays out). If you are a well know org or person in the community and you need someone to put up 10 ICP for your neuron to get named, DM me. I need to get the Dev Board to approve this, but provided they do, I think it is an ok use of community funds.
Disclaimer: i am a part of icdev.org. however i commend @skilesare on his dedication as seen on the forum.
It is very seductive to hold that much power. However i see that @skilesare is wielding that power with great responsibility and care. Also he is pretty prodigious on the forum.
I wonder if this should be the standard for named neurons ; in context of time, effort and interest.
@weedpatch2 and I were just discussing this. We realized that two members is difficult because one member has the unilateral authority to reject any proposal. We will be looking for a 3rd member soon.
hey…relax it’s the weekend…take it easy…what ever fuck up ( or maybe not) you think you made is already done. Just take your Girlfriend or Boyfriend out for a drink, get a massage or something. stop watching CMC. you are not going to influence anybody in this forum. Smart people hang around here.