The repository was created specifically for open-source purposes, with the code sorted, formatted, and thoroughly commented. The version is fully up-to-date, reflecting the production environment as a guarantee.
This reflects our approach to repository management. So no repo is discarded. Meanwhile, ongoing development during the SNS period continues based on our dev repository. Having the repos separated for different uses would be ideal.
No other info has been provided on my concerns as well.
Make sure the community can have a proper review of your project, i know it could be a great project but it seems you rushing…
Hey @Trils, we also believe this could be a great DAO! Thank you.
Your previous concerns regarding liquidity/DEX/CEX roadmaps were taken very seriously. It’s very much in-line with what we would like to provide the community. Great dApps and an easy-to-use token with loads of utility. After answering your questions I mentioned that the final information regarding liquidity would be out pre-SNS launch. I am still doing so and have decided to create a video where we discuss the CANI roadmap. As you may have seen from our X timeline we have been filming a lot. There is just not enough marketing in this eco. Today we are releasing discussions with musicians and their thoughts on Web3.
We have been prepared, we was not aware of a few things and are now rushing to get them done. This would be due to the fact that the holidays are approaching.
Why CANI? The thoughts and feelings of us all are important, we are creating a DAO. A very important voice is one of the creators themselves.
I’ve added the first video to this post, you can view it here.
The rest you can find on X throughout the week.
Hey community,
Thank you for the massive support so far! we have had many votes supporting the CANI DAO proposal.
We’ve received feedback from Dfinity regarding our SNS proposal. Unfortunately, the proposal will be rejected due to one key issue: our code was not made 100% open source for the full two weeks, as outlined in the SNS guidelines.
While this was an oversight on our part, we’re pleased to share that everything else in the proposal has successfully passed their review. The only remaining step is to meet the required timeframe to allow the community adequate time to analyze our code.
We are already working to resubmit the proposal shortly, ensuring full compliance with the guidelines this time. We appreciate your patience and continued support as we move closer to bringing the CANI DAO to life.
Writing this on behalf of DFINITY]:
At this time, DFINITY will reject the proposal as per guidelines, the full code should be open-sourced for at least two weeks.
We have only reviewed the proposal per these guidelines. We will make additional assessments when the next proposal is submitted.
Thank you, I have notified the community. We totally understand.
The votes in favour for the CANI DAO have blown me away regardless. Seeing this has increased our motivation even more!
We’ll send in another proposal some time after Christmas, that will give over two weeks for the community to review the above.
Regarding further assessments after next proposal, does that mean during the next two weeks we will not be assessed? Codes, yaml init file etc?
Also, can we still use this forum post for SNS consideration?
Please continue to use this forum post.
Once you submit the proposal in two weeks, DFINITY and the community should again review and vote based on all of the details that have been provided.
Hey Community!
This is a heads-up, we aim to send in our proposal next week on the 26th.
Any questions feel free to ask here, please also check our timeline on X for community announcements.
Kind regards,
Barry
Merry X’mas, community
An additional diagram of CaniSafe simplifies overview, illustrating its four core components:
identity, wallet, computation, and storage -all unified into one service.
It also demonstrates how CaniSafe integrates with Internet Identity, CaniPlay, and CaniStore dApps, while being deployed on the EU subnet.
The re-submission is now live on the NNS!
All details remain the same except we’ve lowered the resolution of our logo (due to recent events) and added capital letters to name (from Cani DAO to CANI DAO) to match the branding. Input spaces in the description to improve readability and the link to the new launch video.
Let’s go! As always any questions feel free to ask here.
SOS
My neuron can’t vote on CaniDAO proposal.
But I can vote on anything else. Recently voted for ICTO but not CaniDAO.
I NEED HELP
The votes are coming in so let’s get your vote counted too. Looks like an isolated issue, maybe @jennifertran can help?
There is no issue. Answer was provided in this duplicated thread.
The said neuron is over 12 months old.
Yea, that seams like it. I understand thanks.
But, I didn’t vote NO for this project. Won’t call it a mistake. may be a bug in the system.
I am a creator and already have music up on this project (CaniPlay). I can’t say No to CaniDAO.
But, I will keep my lense out for similar events in the future. I will report it when this repeats itself.
Thank for fishing it out.
I suspect that you’re following a neuron on this topic, and they’ve already rejected (so your neuron rejected in turn). I would check for you, but I can see that your neuron is currently set to private.
Can I share some thoughts?
I love the concept. I really dislike the name. There are two issue that I have with it: How it’s pronounced makes it feel clunky to say especially for a subject word with more than one syllable that ends with a long “I” sound, it feels unatural to say mid sentence. The other aspect that makes the name awkward to say is that it comes from a more than commonly used colloquial phrase which undermines it’s brand identity.
What I think does stick is the CAN itself. It could stand for Creator Aligned Networking and the overarching network of dApps can be referred to as UniCAN - United Creator Aligned Network with the coin being branded as UCan, instead of asking a question and being unsure, UCan answers the quesiton while still focusing on the individual. UCanSecure, UCanSell, UCanPlay.
Despite having a great concept, it’s important to note when branding makes or breaks a project. There’s a reason why iPhone looks and sounds good while Phonei looks and sounds phoney. Branding is a project’s first impression. It has to be smooth in its delivery, yet deliver it remarkably. Branding is a determinant of success and I hope you can succeed.
Hey @MisterEuclid
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, and I really appreciate the kind words about CANI being a great concept!
The name CANI comes from ICP’s Canisters, which we use to store data in the ecosystem. It’s a key part of the project’s uniqueness and ties directly to the technology we’re building on.
While the CANI name already has some traction within our community, I do agree branding plays a huge role, and I’ll definitely take your feedback on board as we move forward.
