Can anyone help me understand what happened here?
@hpeebles was this somehow intentional?
Either way, I’m wondering the implications are for staking and rewards/penalties in cases like these.
It seems like duplicate proposals could automatically be rejected, but that assumes using unique URLs and my understanding is that there’s no such restriction.
To my knowledge the same URL can legitimately be used for multiple proposals as long as the content has changed. This brings up a separate point, in that the contents at an arbitrary URL can be changed after (or even during!) voting.