What’s all the use of this amazing alien tech if the accessibility level is too high?
DAO’S on the IC are worked into the fabric to be easily accessible and many tools are built to nurture and help them grow like seeds into beautiful flowers.
Likeminded people can rally together, have empowerment using the tools of openchat, catalyze etc - and BUIDL together.
Stomping down on the likes of GHOST because they were able to rally into something special is very, very bearish for the future of the IC.
Because by doing so, you are stomping down on your main userbase and usecase.
There is nothing funny about what you are doing. You created a fake account to respond to @gatsby_esp instead of using your public identity. If you want to shine light on a different perspective, then you can do it in an intellectually honest way that doesn’t violate the rules of the forum and you don’t need to impersonate someone else.
What rubs the wrong way is your impersonation of someone else with a fake account that you probably don’t mind if it gets banned. It’s a cowardly act. If you have something to say, then stand up and say it with whatever public identity you normally use.
This entire comment is a great example of an intellectually honest contribution to this conversation. Why can’t you do that with your normal public identity? You are clearly an active member of the ICP community and have some useful things to say. Why do you feel the need to do it with this new account that assumes someone else’s identity?
I don’t mind KYC if it was perfect, but it’s not.
You can check here https://haveibeenpwned.com/
The KYC data ends up somewhere and then it gets hacked and your info is packed in a db posted on the dark web for someone to buy.
Thank you everyone for the lively discussion and valuable feedback.
One concern that has been brought to our attention is that the maximum sale amount should be increased from 20,000 ICP to 30,000 ICP in order to protect early buyers.
We want to invite further input on this topic, and any other details in general, but also want to remind everyone to please keep it civil. We respect everyone’s opinions!
The sneed developers are very sincere and transparent. I am an early participant of sneed, and I have witnessed the process of community self-initiated discussion and purchase of sneed. I highly appreciate the innovation of sneed’s economic model. Sneed has inadvertently hedged against the high inflation of ICP in eight years, and as the burning intensifies, sneed will become as precious and rare as NFTs. With the establishment of such a SNS DAO, who can be sure that sneed will not create a great community and products like MKR in the future?
I wish sneed can be launched on SNS ASAP, and realize the automation of canister, LP, and staking ASAP, and achieve more innovation through governance.
Can you do 10000-50000? It’s nice to make a humble offering, but won’t be nice if everything is sold out early, but will be nice when those who miss out spill over to the open marketplace.
The token economics of ICP is entirely inflationary. Although we accept this governance consensus, this inflation is a chronic depreciation for 1-2 year holders. SNEED has the genes to hedge against inflation as a derivative.
