Your opinion of the SNS conforms to the traditional way the SNS has been leveraged.
I can appreciate your vision for the SNS, and I share your ethos that communities should be able to govern the decision making process of a project. (This is why I created Personal DAOs to permit their respective communities the opportunity to govern and update their DAOs in directions that are specific to their needs- in adherence to the ethos you’ve expressed. )
I believe the SNS offers an arena for experimentation for various models of decentralized economy.
Thus far, the SNSs that have been launched conform to a single model of decentralized economy: namely, a single enterprise that is governed by a single SNS.
I’m introducing a new model of decentralized economy that I believe will contribute to the robustness of the ICP ecosystem. Rather than leveraging the SNS to govern a single sovereign enterprise (as has been the case with all previous SNSs) , I’m leveraging the SNS to govern the token that will be used to facilitate the development of an entire ecosystem of sovereign enterprises (Personal DAOs).
I’m confident Personal DAO will be an example for other developers looking to offer sovereign apps to end-users. I can foresee this model being implemented by devs who wish to sell and update sovereign data storage apps, wallet apps, chat apps, etc…
While i do believe that precedent is important, i also think it’s very important not allow the ecosystem to be bogged down by following precedent at the expense of innovation. This happens all too often in the tradFi realm and it leads to obsoletion if left unchecked.
I’m offering an SNS launch that experiments with and extends upon decentralized economy.