Thanks for admitting you are here to combat us. I am going to give you information just the way your community does - by not giving you any. Keep digging, put your imagination to work. Check the SNS config, neurons, track funds, I wont be doing the work for you. I am definitely looking into yours.
Wasn’t this thread about giving transparency? Why are you suddenly doing a 180?
Makes me think you were never honest about it from the start, @infu.
Feeling insulted. Your friends should at least send someone who can read to troll and discredit me. Scroll to the top
Did your sns sale have a maximum allowed to commit per person?
I’m the one that should feel insulted considering all I asked from you was full transparency so that every participant in the ecosystem can follow the money trail, not just experienced users like us. Instead I just get personally attacked because I dared to question your honesty for good reasons given all the evidence presented.
Also, I have never spoken with @Mico besides warning him about a certain person and giving some grief on Telegram for his previous disbelief.
Isn’t it wild how infu and Adam attack people by calling them names and assuming things about those who dare ask them for transparency.
Especially on a thread made by infu to give answers about shady things we find on his dao.
This goes against the form guidelines.
If you make any claims please provide evidence of these claims.
I’m sure that @Leadership will be enforcing their brand new update in the policy here.
I would consider your requests @vavram and @Mico, under normal circumstances, except you also participate in all other threads and refuse to see the evidence provided. Mico brought this thread up in his words, for ‘combating’ reasons.
I have nothing personal against you @Mico I just pointed out a few times you should be banned for polluting threads and diversion from topics that matter, and what you bring to the forum brings no value.
These are the forum threads you are panically attempting to hide from sight.
You have provided nothing but theory of an attack in those forums.
I’ve asked for the data to the claims that others own 51%
As for value to the forums. It’s not for you to decide. I provided data to show you’re owned by Adam and he hid his investment in you to create the illusion of more decentralized dao.
And if we want to go on banning people because we don’t like them then you’d have a dead forum. As Adam and you go around name calling while adding no evidence to support your wild claims
Do you want to link up in a cabal w me?
So because you hold a grudge against me for a different reason, you refuse to offer the full transparency which could help the majority of participants in this ecosystem make better decisions?
That’s not very nice of you
This thread wasn’t about transparency. It was a show to try and avoid it.
If he cared about transparency he wouldn’t be attacking everyone who asks a question that isn’t scripted by Adam.
You can scroll up and read; everything you asked for is there. Do you guys want me to paint you a picture of it?
You posted a thread about your theory to improve wtn. I’m not sure how that counts as evidence to things.
You avoided a lot of questions about your project in here already. I doubt we will actually get transparency from you. We at least now know that Adam owns your dao and if you do anything to go against him you lose your work.
It makes sense that he wants you to do his dev work as he would own it all anyways. Just was in the shadows until now.
I wouldn’t go that far personally, I can’t rule out the possibility of @borovan holding the Neutrinite DAO ransom so that @infu doesn’t deviate from his plans given the evidence you presented.
I asked for a detailed report with transaction ids attached to every treasury transfer so that everyone can follow the trail regardless of how technically proficient someone is.
All you have to do to join a cabal is to buy 100 WTN and stake it in a neuron. A cabal is defined as anyone that Adam doesn’t like. Since he doesn’t like WaterNeuron, we are all a cabal. There are 889 of us so far and we would welcome your membership.
I agree with wenzel
What’s a cabel? Is Wenzel the cabel guy?
I guess so…git-r-dun