Please feel free to provide any criticism on the Neutrinite DAO I’ve founded. I will hold no grudge. Any rumors, ill intent, or schemes we may have been up to. Perhaps a master plan of some sort. Maybe to drain the IC through our standards (which nobody uses) and our experimental arbitrage bots from a few months ago, or that we have 61% voting power through followers on non-critical proposals. Or that we went lazy and didn’t update the Icpcoins site enough while draining the treasury. Perhaps a link to a cabal. How we didn’t do anything for the common good or did too much common good while sacrificing NTN interests. That we are delaying the launch. Maybe a vaporware. Anything works.
I am just getting the feeling if we want to move forward, we have to clear things up. I am not under the impression every decision I’ve made is the right one, there are tens of trade-offs devs/founders have to pick every day. The transparency in these decisions is pretty much non-existent and would be counterproductive. If SNSes are getting checked out, NTN should also be scrutinized. Unless you don’t think what we do matters and this is some kind of attention-seeking post, then feel free to ignore it.
Dude nobody cares, go back to coding
I have done a tremendous amount of DD on neutrinite dao
You check out. Good 2 go. Carry on.
(Abeg na release the vectors)
Please keep those magic words out of this chat
Well you did transfer around 138k ICP from the treasury since Neutrinite DAO launched:
Can you give an extensive explanation on how have you made use of all that ICP in 15 months since launch?
58k ICP are in NTNs vector neuron. 5k ICP went for DEX liquidity. 5k ICP in WTN launch, 6k ICP getting DKP, 3k ICP for nICP, 5k for KONG launch. Going to show you where the rest went too, need some time.
When you’re done, for transparency sake could you also add the transaction id for each of these transfers?
You passed the CEO OF DFINITY TEST (me)
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK 
Vavram saving Icp from the menace that is the smartest dev in the eco building and testing defi vectors. Genius work vavram.
Seems like a good start @infu
A Dashboard for DAO statistics would be great. Stats like voting, proposal, burn rate, etc. It is true that confidence in SNS is being impacted by these controversies.
I would like to see the updated products personally because I check out the token prices everyday on IC.
Also don’t know if this helps: Parkinson’s law states that work expands as to fill the time available for its completion
As a user I would prefer a bug free dapp or DeFi project in the end
Any updates on the transfers and their respective transaction ids, @infu?
SNS proposals [https://dashboard.internetcomputer.org/sns/extk7-gaaaa-aaaaq-aacda-cai/proposals]
Filter “Transfer SNS Treasury Funds” and you will get all proposals needed
Here is the treasury address with all ICP transactions
[https://dashboard.internetcomputer.org/account/e6c824c84552a15262d45f3648e59053ebab6cec9685ab71fd6ef20976769d7e]
You can see the treasury balances of tokens and neurons here https://dev.ic-toolkit.app/
Except the ICP neuron which is in a canister governed by the DAO https://dashboard.internetcomputer.org/canister/6jvpj-sqaaa-aaaaj-azwnq-cai
Thanks but my request wasn’t for me personally, I can already find all the transfers from the Neutrinite SNS treasury. The reason I asked for you to make a post with all the transfers along with their associated tx ids was in order to make a transparent report for everyone, including the less technically inclined members of the community.
Does adam not have over 33% vp in your dao?
@infu Is this false? did you know he used multiple id to invest? Or were you unaware until this crusade started to happen?
What was your role in hiding your source of funding in the sns launchpad?
Was the source of the sns sale “hidden”?
Hey! Thanks for joining the thread designated for this.
Can’t reveal information about specific DAO members, that would violate their privacy.
NTN isn’t representing all users on the IC, it’s not very decentralized, but enough for now. Only time and development will decentralize it further.
Is there an attack vector on the ICP that is going to dilute everyone you are suspecting us of? Like what we suspect is happening now, with the help of you (mostly spamming forums) and WTN at nearly 95% certainty.
Hey you should disclose your interests as adam who controls your dao is pushing for ntn to create a liquid staking project.
Other wise you’re creating a shadow cabal and are guilty of what you accuse others of with only 95% confidence and no proof shown.
(While I have 100% confidence adam contributed at least 39% to your sns sale) And I have posted evidence of this claim.
In other words please post your “95% certainty” to the public or stop your misleading claims because you are a bought man.
Of course, when we make a liquid staking solution, in any form, anywhere, we will make sure everyone knows who is voting.
Don’t worry, I will most probably compile the 200-page PDF myself 
Please do. I have been asking for your proof so I can see if I am wrong with the data I do have.
btw seeing you and adam scream about “shadow control” while he controls you in the shadows is highly ironic. It opens up the question if you sold your soul for funding as if you speak out against him you lose all your work. (as seen with every other dao)
How do I join a shadow cabal of people to finance upcoming sns dao