No, ICFC is a legit DAO.
But to prove it, I’ll provoke the beast.
@borovan could not take control of ICFC, even as the biggest token holder. Would love him to try though 
1 Like
Ah, I see, you’re talking about tokens rather than VP. In any case, I wouldn’t go playing with fire. Unless you’re already in a bind, I’d suggest you assume the worst.
Tokens are VP but you know this obvs.
Real founders love their projects, and you can’t just take them.
They build relationships with a range of investors and most importantly - they don’t sell ANY tokens, not even the interest.
Adam is not some danger to me, he’s the only thing I see right now that will restore value to the decentralised services we are creating, largely by removing the bad ones.
As for a ‘bind’, not sure what you mean.
7 Likes
2 Likes
He’s no danger to your SNS for now, who knows on which side of the bed @borovan wakes up tomorrow.
1 Like
My values are never for sale.
I disagree that this is possible. But we will just sit around and watch it never happen.
Having a SNS treasury that’s almost empty helps your case , no doubt about it.
1 Like
That’s not an issue with me, I’m just as committed and focused as James is.
2 Likes
This is slander. Provide data
I sent 2k ICP there today btw, completely unsolicited. I don’t want to have to deal with the team right now but I know they are on the same path as I am.
How are you going to spin that?
3 Likes
10x worse corruption than what’s in the ecosystem in the Foundation but they don’t talk about that.
Increasing rejection cost should be an easy way to counteract his antics. Why is no KOL from WTN proposing that?
