The Battle of the BOOM

Prelude

The target audience for this post is other retail investors like myself, who are trying to understand what on earth happened with BOOM this last month. I’m not going to pretend to you that I understand EVERYTHING, but in doing a bit of research I learned some things about SNS governance, and I hope I can share a bit of knowledge I picked up along the way.

I will try to keep this as simple as possible, my goal is to paint a picture of what happened so that the history books have the record straight. And to put any doubts to rest.

Before I begin the tale, it is important to understand that @borovan and the BOOM Dao dev team are not mere mortals like you and I. They are not manually clicking buttons in the UI of DEXes. They are making use of custom scripts, applications, defi vectors and other tooling to fight their battles. This is a constant full fledged financial cyber war that is occurring. The combatants are wizards of their craft.

4-10-25
The peoples champ, borovan, manages to accumulate enough staked BOOM tokens to block a DEV team treasury proposal. Keep in mind, this is the same DEV team who 1 month after their initial SNS release withdrew millions of dollars of funds.

This kicks off a race. For weeks both borovan and the Dev team are attempting to gain the upper hand. Both sides are accumulating tokens, convincing people to follow them, staking tokens, changing dissolve delays on their tokens, and submitting hundreds of SNS proposals. Most of these SNS proposals submitted by both sides, are just noise, to distract and obfuscate. But some of these proposals contain updates that change the rules of the game. For weeks, both sides are constantly firing these things off trying to land a critical blow to give them the upper hand.

4-26-25
For a while, it appears borovan is winning. Using the above described tactics he manages to pry his initial investment from these scum. He nearly manages to mint (and burn) BOOM tokens, which would have skyrocketed the price for all retail holders and made him an absolute legend. But the DEV team recovers their position in time to stop him, it barely fails.

Notice, none of the voting power, was transferred from borovans side to the dev team. There was no deal made here, this was pure financial warfare.

5-02-25

Whether through exhaustion, or pure attrition, it becomes clear that the Dev team is regaining control. They manage to gain enough voting power to stop borovan from making any more changes. Because the SNS parameters are constantly changing, it is impossible as a lay person to figure out exactly what is going on. There are wild swings in the voting power of both sides from proposal to proposal, but it is clear the dev team is coming out ahead. Our champion is running out of steam.

5-5-25

Hidden in a barrage of 50+ other decoys, the DEV team manages to slip in this haymaker. Proposal #617

This creates a timing window, starting at 2:54:29 AM UTC during which only neurons with a dissolve delay of 54+ years would be eligible to vote (as opposed to 5 years). It’s hard to notice because they just added a 0. Meaning in order to stop them, borovan must have his own neurons changed to 54+ years. But he didn’t notice.

Sure enough with 2 tiny 83 year neurons, under cover of darkness, the DEV team strikes:

Minting tokens (not to burn, but to make it impossible for borovan to win). And again pilfering the treasury. Our hero was defeated.

Aftermath

I made a post the other day, because I was deceived. But I said something in that post that was true. Borovan cannot win this battle alone. He lit hundreds of thousands of dollars on fire here, to force his adversaries to do the same, in a fight for the people.

We must not let his efforts be in vain.

The community must tolerate these scum no longer. The proletariat must rise and drive these crooks from the ecosystem. If you wish to defend these people, please make it known in this thread so that we can drive you out too.

And that’s all I have to say about that.

(I give full permission to anyone, to republish this anywhere on all socials. I’m not really a social media guy. You need not attribute this to me, just get the message out. Thanks @ysyms @jordn01 )

22 Likes

Thanks for making a summary what happend. But what can we do know… it feels like another: yeah… sh*t happends… NEXT!

2 Likes

@ysyms
characters 20 or something

I’m not a huge stakeholder but I think Max and Tommy should come here and have an actual discussion about their stance in behalf of stakeholders, like @borovan has been putting in the work, I invite them not to hide behind their screens, they were/are running an organization and they need to step up and show up for themselves.

2 Likes

CodeGov has not and will not have any association with projects on the IC. Members may choose to support a project individually if they wish, but as a team, we simply want the best for all legitimate projects on the Internet Computer.

BOOM DAO is a clear example of a failed or scammy project. It failed because it was a scam. They could have made an effort to build a good game, but they didn’t—even now, there’s nothing to show for it. It’s a shame, especially considering that PokedStudio didn’t raise via the SNS and actually delivered a game.

Many people supported these projects at the time, and most of them failed. Welcome to the pre-seed markets. Pre-seed startups—like those in Y Combinator or similar early-stage accelerators—have much higher failure rates, often 60–90% within the first few years. Many don’t even survive the first 12–18 months.

In hindsight, I think we should have burned the treasury or sent it to PokedStudio. Instead, it got hacked—because as a community, we were too focused on demonizing the other side. And we continue to do so. I just hope we can come out of this stronger and actually focus on building great projects here. Let’s also make an effort to support the builders who have kept going, even through the bear market.

I agree, let’s get the team members of BOOM DAO if we can on here to explain.

4 Likes

Thank you for your vote of support. I’m glad to have you onboard.

1 Like

This was my review of BOOM DAO at the time. I should have seen the red flags…

1 Like


The war is not over yet. If the foundation does not oppose this proposal, then it is necessary to discuss the details.

1 Like

Boom Dao team should be ashamed of themselves. Total criminals.
How disgusting to steal funds from the community and to produce literally nothing.
You should have let Borovan and the community take it over.
Not lie, cheat, and steal.

Losers.

4 Likes

@ang @severin @Leadership

Someone flagged the main post.

I know theres a policy of not outting flaggers of posts. But i believe this warrants an exception.

2 Likes

What if this is going through… who did this proposal? Do we loose our investment completely… its a shame that there is no clarification here… i am confused..

If you are still holding tokens liquid tokens, im not sure why.

The dev team, just minted tokens out of thin air. The tokens are worthless.

Im sorry, we lost this one.

1 Like

Because i can’t… its not working an icps…
No cycles for boom tokens…

Go vote to delete them on NNS


my posts are automatically hidden - yesterday Dfinity team explainted that its because of some terms , but this posts has 0 words could trigger - it must be selective- what a disaster for this forum

1 Like