SNS: New feature, delete token if they don't function as a DAO? 🗳️

General
1

ICPCoins → How does the DAO work? I have serious doubts if it really is a DAO…

Proposal 45: “Add $BITCORN To ICPCoins”
NNS Dapp
Status: Open :question::ballot_box:
Created: Jun 15, 2024 7:02 PM
Status on the web: Listed :white_check_mark:

Proposal 41: “Add Rosetta ( $ROS ) To ICPCoins”
NNS Dapp
Status: Executed :white_check_mark:
Executed: Jun 9, 2024 6:04 AM :white_check_mark:
Status on the web: Not listed :x:

I am going to vote in favor of BITCORN, but this is not really functioning as a DAO :man_shrugging:

2

I’m not understanding your suggested feature or complaint. What is the issue? As I currently don’t have a Neutrinite Neuron

3

It looks like FranHefner is pointing out a potential issue with the execution and listing process of proposals in the DAO. Specifically, Proposal 41: “Add Rosetta ($ROS) To ICPCoins” was executed but not listed on the web, which raises questions about the effectiveness and transparency of the DAO.

Maybe it’s worth looking into whether there was a technical error or an oversight. This situation could be a good opportunity for the community and the developers to review and possibly improve the proposal implementation process. Transparent communication from the developers could really help clear up any confusion.

1 Like
4

I believe that the developers should only execute what the DAO decides. Otherwise, we are just pretending to be a DAO. There may be technical issues, but they have never communicated this. It should be made public if a proposal couldn’t be executed due to technical reasons. Additionally, the ROS token is ICRC1 like most tokens, so I don’t think it’s a technical issue.

On another note, another proposal was executed without closing the voting stage, which is also not correct.