Interesting. @borovan has used his 7% total voting power in the NNS to adopt this proposal 135750, which suggests that the NNS should take control of a neuron from one person and give it to someone else. Should this be considered an abuse of power? Anyway, I wonder how Adam, or the community, would react if someone proposed to divide up his 1.5M ICP neuron that we saw him use recently to submit the 35 proposals that would change the network.
Let’s use this proposal as a learning opportunity for how liquid democracy works. I’ll voluntarily give that neuron, and the internet identity that controls it, to Adam if he is willing the donate his next 25 ICP proposal rejection fee to charity instead of wasting everyone’s time. Then we can get back to legitimate governance like nothing happened.
By the way, the CodeGov known neuron has voted to reject this proposal. You can also see the whopping 2.5% total voting power that we triggered in the voting history.
