1 why does this need an sns can’t you just make a dao without the sns?
2 do you already have active contributors to this project or is it in your mind
1 why does this need an sns can’t you just make a dao without the sns?
2 do you already have active contributors to this project or is it in your mind
Sneed dao is great, and the developer is very good, but it really cannot represent sns1. The symbolic significance of sns1 is irreplaceable
Oo so do you have a large stake of dkp and will change sns back?
I suggest you take a look at the previous posts. Both I and several early community members of sns1 have suggested restarting sns1,A fully SNS, where everyone is a developer and a responsible party
Oh so you’re gonna make a new dao and call it sns1. I look forward to the post card generating apps it controls.
No, I am not a developer, nor do I control sns1( is controlled by nns.), nor do I benefit from it. All tokens are sold decentralized. I just put forward this proposal (anyone can do it)
I welcome your proposal to start your dao. Goodluck.
I suggest waiting for a month or two before proceeding.
The minimum amount of ICP to raise during the sale would need to be enough for ongoing cycles needs assuming conservative ICP price levels. Also, as mentioned, if the token has no utility then it at least needs a rewards inflow to incentivise staking.
Without this it isn’t a SNS launch I would support (particularly given that there would otherwise be nothing being decentralised).
As @Henry_Suso points out, there are already plenty of ways to form DAOs easily that do not involve tokens. If you want to get off the ground in the meantime I suggest starting there. CO DELTA is one example, and so is ALPHA-Vote.
Isn’t co deta just another codegov? why do you need to plug your facade of a "D"AO when discussion is about SNS-1
thank god SNS launches aren’t hardcoded to your “support”.. ![]()
don’t worry, he has been fully expunged from that specific body cavity
Oh great, Mr “I’ve been programming for 500 years and can’t decipher basic hexadecimal” has been accidentally summoned, I’m sorry everyone.
No, codegov was never a DAO, it was fully controlled by Wenzel. CO.DELTA initially competed with CodeGov, and it is fully decentralised (it’s a real DAO). CodeGov is gone, and CO.DELTA is still here and has never had anything to do with Wenzel other than recognising it needed to deliver something better for the IC. No one is in control of CO.DELTA, and it consistently delivers high quality due diligence that the NNS depends on.
Yeah yeah yeah and I invented Mozzarella and Jalapeños
Would you like some on your Burrito ?
Now this one is much more interesting.
Good job everybody.
Drinks all around yah?
Looking forward to that proposal on the NNS.
Sir, what do you think of the new SNS1 Dao??????????
need to seek the opinion of dfinity as we have used their design for the sns1 logo and website. Do you know who is in charge of this matter? @Lorimer @borovan4000
Sounds misleading to me. So does the name SNS1
Oh that’s a problem now is it?
We kinda thought that was how the game is played.
to me codeta name sounds misleading. why not call it codegov 2