Proposal 137216 – LaCosta | CodeGov
Vote: ADOPT
As part of the Steps for Gen-1 Node onboarding after 48 months, the Node Provider ParaFi Technologies NS LLC is creating the Node Operator dmqux
to hold 14 nodes in the ny1 DC that are being handed over by NP Rivonia Holdings LLC.
The following steps were followed:
- A Forum post by the buyer NP (and a further one for this proposal)
- The self-declaration, Proof of Identity, Assessment of Independence and handover statement documents were uploaded on the IC Wiki
- The Node Operator ID proposed is new
- A statement, published on the IC wiki, signed by both the current and the new node provider
Currently the NP has a total of 0 type1.1
nodes which means it can add the proposed 14 nodes and still have a possibility of adding an additional 28 nodes before meeting the maximum number of nodes 42
.
For reference on the transaction of the nodes bought by ParaFi Technologies NS LLC
check the following post
This proposal also follows the removal of the Node Operators from NP Rivonia Holdings LLC on proposals 137077 and 137077.
As I state in my previous review for the registration of NP ParaFi Technologies NS LLC:
On another note:
Looking at comments like this is sad and almost shows no progress in the conversation that were had until now. So now not even audits are enough. This type of comments come in the form of “let’s achieve decentralization” but mean “I see myself as a regulator/government and only when I have the power to take away your assets will I have achieve decentralization”.
Not only are most people not accepting responses from @andy-parafi but also seem to take in higher regard posts on a forum than a signed document!!!
I didn’t want this post to be like this but I feel this topic as come to be absurd where reasonable arguments are lost in the face of this type of comments.
I don’t feel any problem in accepting this proposal specially with an audit being in the horizon that will confirm if anything is untruthful here
I only accept a proposals for increasing the rewards after the audit is done which hopefully will finalize the process.
The objective of bringing auditors to the issue was to stop conspiracy theories and have trust in the independence of NPs but is warning that some people can’t remove themselves from controlling the process and information.
About CodeGov
- reliable, credible, and sensible NNS governance
CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron's Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.
Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.