New Node Provider Proposals

[Uvaca]

Thanks @DavidM for posting this on my behalf. For context for the community, I wasn’t able to post on the forum immediately.

But as his post states, I intend to take over the operations in PL1 DC as a new Node Provider.

Thank you all.

[quint]

Proposal #134532 Review — Quint | Aviate Labs

Vote: ADOPT
Review

• Forum Introduction
• Self-Declaration and Proof of Identity Documents
• Matching Hashes
• Uvcac Labs LLC is listed in Delaware’s Public Chamber of Commerce.

[timk11]

Voted to adopt proposal 134532, as an introduction on the forum has been provided, document hashes given in the Wiki match those of the provided self-declaration documents, and the company information can be verified on the Delaware Division of Corporations namesearch page.

[ZackDS]

Voted to adopt proposal #134532.

The proposal meets the requirements, it has a proper forum intro, the hashes from the documents uploaded to the wiki match.

Proposal #134660 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted

Reason:
Uvaca Labs LLC will be taking over excess nodes from 87m Neuron, this proposal adds dvfhx-jb24w-j6t5m-i7hv7-7a6on-heiyd-cgjrk-kby5c-nhej4-lmbql-yae as a new node operator ID for NP Uvaca Labs that will be used to redeploy 28 nodes of “type1” in the PL1 data center.
The proposal is correct, data in the payload match, and it is in line with the requirements to update interim Gen-1 NP remuneration after 48 months.
The hash of the Excess Node Handover Statement is a match.

About CodeGov (click to expand).

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these topics and Synapse on most other topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron and KongSwap with a known neuron and credible Followees.


Learn more about CodeGov and it’s mission at codegov.org.

[ZackDS]

Voted to adopt proposal #134533.

The proposal sets node_allowance = 1 for node operator id nvocp-jlbys-d44wi-od3pv-iws4n-2nll3-73hqk-koh72-3obvg-kt5v3-fae . Previously when doing this a node provider id was also included in the payload along with a forum post, but following Dfinity’s vote I adopted it as well.

[katiep]

@0rions and @EnzoPlayer0ne

Can you please identify yourselves as winners of our auction, and provide a bit of information so people know why you are proposing to be a NP? Right now only those who purchase Gen-1 excess nodes are getting support from the community, and your posts here do not identify yourselves as such.

PS, the wiki documents are approved.

[LaCosta]

Proposal 134532

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal to register a new NP ‘Uvaca Labs LLC’. The proposal follows the requirements stated here.

1. A Forum post by the new NP
2. The self-declaration and Proof of Identity documents were uploaded on the IC Wiki
3. The hashes of the Self declaration and Proof of Identity documents match the hashes in the proposal
   

[LaCosta]

Proposal 134533

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal updates the config of the Node Operator nvocp-jlbys-d44wi-od3pv-iws4n-2nll3-73hqk-koh72-3obvg-kt5v3-fae with Node Provider Bitmoon which matches the proposal as can be seen with the ic-admin tool.

The Node Provider already has a node machine 6hqi5 in the li2 DC which matches the proposal motivation of changing the node_allowance to register a node in the li2 DC.

[louisevelayo]

(edited by Author)

Proposal #134533 Review — Louise | Aviate Labs

Vote: REJECT ADOPT
Review:

• The payload of this proposal looks to be incomplete. It is missing the dc_id and node_provider_id .
• I am not sure if this will overwrite the existing NO record that already has these details.
• For that reason, I vote to reject.
• I learned that null in a proposal will not overwrite the existing data in the registry.
• So from previous discussion, this proposal will add 1 extra node to the data center li2 and NO ID nvocp-jlbys-d44wi-od3pv-iws4n-2nll3-73hqk-koh72-3obvg-kt5v3-fae, which is inline with the intent of the NP - to add another rewardable node to this DC, as was permitted by their original allowance.
• Thus, I vote to adopt this proposal.

[timk11]

Voted to adopt proposal 134533. The node operator ID in the proposal payload matches that of the existing node owned by this node provider in the LI2 data centre. The proposal configures the node allowance to allow 1 additional node to be registered as per earlier discussion in this thread. Ideally the proposal should contain a forum link for comment but I don’t think this has been made a standard requirement yet.

[roald-av8]

Proposal #134532 Review — Roald | Aviate Labs

Vote: ADOPT
Review

• You can find the forum introduction of the new NP @Uvaca here
• The self declaration, proof of identity documents and Handover statement were shared here
• The hashes of the self declaration and proof identity listed in the proposal match what is listed in the wiki. See the screenshot below.

• You can verify Uvcaca Labs LLC in the Delaware public chamber of commerce registry here.

For the reasons above, I vote to adopt.

[quint]

Proposal #134533 Review — Quint | Aviate Labs

Vote: ADOPT
Review:

• NO ID nvocp-jlbys-d44wi-od3pv-iws4n-2nll3-73hqk-koh72-3obvg-kt5v3-fae
• DC ID li2
• Node Allowance 1

The proposal updates the configuration for the Node Operator with the specified ID under Node Provider Bitmoon, as verified in the registry. This aligns with the proposal’s intent to adjust the node allowance to enable the registration of an additional node in the li2 data center.

[roald-av8]

Proposal #134533 Review — Roald | Aviate Labs

Vote: ADOPT
Review

Request to add 1 node to li2 by Bitmoon:

• Node Operator ID verified & confirmed here as nvocp-jlbys-d44wi-od3pv-iws4n-2nll3-73hqk-koh72-3obvg-kt5v3-fae
• The proposal aligns with Bitmoon’s initial node allowance.

Therefore I vote to adopt proposal #134533

[1eo]

Thanks @katiep, I just updated my post with more information!

[Charles_Witte]

Hi everyone,

Cross posting this information here for your visibility and as instructed

Proposal: Update Interim Gen-1 Node Provider Remuneration After 48 months

Hello everyone, Please find the necessary information regarding our nodes under the new remuneration structure. Self-Declaration Link: 43rd Big Idea Films, LLC - Internet Computer Wiki Node Count: 14 under the new remuneration structure Data Center: TRG Houston (TRG) Node Deployment Confirmation: Two nodes have been successfully deployed with IPv4 addresses and a domain name in the specified data center Start Date for New Reward Values: Jan 31, 2025 Contact Information: Element/Matrix @ch…

Let me know if you have any questions.

Kind regards,

Charles

[ZackDS]

Voted to reject proposal #134603.

The first node 6hqi5 is correct.
The second node z4avz-jczt7-2ozqw-7esmh-ynrgc-p4dgh-fdqel-ixub6-fi3bo-im4hi-xae is MIA.
The node_provider_id nvocp-jlbys-d44wi-od3pv-iws4n-2nll3-73hqk-koh72-3obvg-kt5v3-fae from the payload is a match to NP Bitmoon

[louisevelayo]

Proposal #134603 Review — Louise | Aviate Labs

Vote: REJECT
Review:

• The second node ID mentioned in the proposal (z4avz-jczt7-2ozqw-7esmh-ynrgc-p4dgh-fdqel-ixub6-fi3bo-im4hi-xae) is not present on the dashboard under this NP.
• This node ID is also not present when checking with ic-admin
  

[quint]

Hi all

Proposal #134603 Review — Quint | Aviate Labs

Vote: REJECT
Review:

• Validate Data

As the second node id (z4avz-jczt7-2ozqw-7esmh-ynrgc-p4dgh-fdqel-ixub6-fi3bo-im4hi-xae) in the proposal does not exist and not does match any node of node provider Bitmoon (mjnyf-lzqq6-s7fzb-62rqm-xzvge-5oa26-humwp-dvwxp-jxxkf-hoel7-fqe) I will vote to reject proposal 134603.

[timk11]

Voted to reject proposal 134603. The proposal intends to increase rewardable nodes for node operator nvocp to 2, but node provider Bitmoon has only 1 node corresponding to this node operator ID and the second node z4avz is obviously yet to be registered as it cannot be found in the IC dashboard.

[SvenF]

I send a message to bitmoon on Element channel to check his two nodes machines in Li2 data center.