Dear Community,
Third times a charm?
My previously submitted proposal seen above, had the wrong node operator ID.
With feedback from @SvenF, I’ve resolved this issue and submitted Proposal 129634 to adjust the node allowance 4 to nodes in the PR1 data center.
As mentioned, this is an update to my previously accepted proposal, and is in-line with the result of the candidate node machine validation topology matrix. The results of the candidate node machine validation and exact configuration run is available on the C12 Wiki with SHA256 hash fc8e3fdfd94f7a5c0a9a884fe949f44e206421fa47ac2844c69ba9c5658d57d2 .
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out. Thank you for your support. Your votes would be greatly appreciated!
Best regards,
Marc Johnson