Is anybody else concerned about the multiple 51% attacks on the sns daos?

This is good to know. Thank you for sharing @borovan. I see that you didn’t list ICVC and NFID Wallet as SNS projects that you are willing to protect. Have you posted anywhere why you have concerns about them? Would you please provide a link? I would like to learn more.

Currently, I would like to better understand why you voted to reject NFID proposal 18. That proposal is simply trying to comply with the new features that DFINITY is rolling out to assign the existing custom NFID proposals to an SNS topic, which is part of the Neon milestone on the Internet Computer Roadmap as described here.

Hey @aterga, @Andre-Popovitch @lara, @bjoernek perhaps this is a good reason to hold off on implementing the SNS Topics Plan. There is at least one SNS that is attempting in good faith to comply with the action required by DFINITY to assign topics, but they are being blocked by a single individual (Adam) who owns enough voting power to ensure critical proposals are rejected for currently unknown reasons. If you look at the proposal history for NFID, this pattern of rejecting proposals started with proposal 13. There has been no explanation for this voting pattern so far and it appears that NFID has a reason to worry about Adam because they are not on his protected list of SNS projects.

1 Like