Enquiry: How many Terabytes of Data is DFINITY hosting on AWS?

[Artemi5]

@hehe

@sat

Who is “we”? And why are you on this forum?

We are members of the ICP community, and we used to be passionate supporters of ICP (although our enthusiasm has waned a bit now). We are seeking answers about ICP, and as an official source, it seems that there has been some selective withholding and deception. Can you address our questions directly and provide honest answers?

@hehe

“We can ask you questions politely, but please don’t evade some issues. You should even proactively explain some of our doubts to the community. I don’t understand how a simple statement like ‘I don’t see either on DFINITY’s blockchain’ can be called ‘Such toxic forum messages.’ What about the things you’ve said? Aren’t those more like deception? If it weren’t for the community’s inquiries, would you admit that some data information is stored on AWS? Or is it still like DOM, using AWS while mocking AWS?”

DFINITY HAS BANNED APOLLON RESEARCH ACCOUNT - TEMPORARILY ON HOLD SINCE 12 HOURS.

WENZEL has actively flagged multiple posts from Apollon Research and has been harrassing Apollon with the Support of DFINITY’s moderators with baseless accusations

THE FLAGS are never resolved by Moderators of DFINITY @Ang

There is clearly no credible neutrality in this blockchain…

[Artemi5]

@hehe

We are members of the ICP community, and we used to be passionate supporters of ICP (although our enthusiasm has waned a bit now). We are seeking answers about ICP, and as an official source, it seems that there has been some selective withholding and deception

Seems like there is still no answer.

Edit: @Sormarler this is our response to your reply below

[Sormarler]

The concerns raised about neutrality and censorship is understandable, but may be misdirected. This forum is hosted by Dfinity, a private entity with its own rules. Their moderation policies do not necessarily reflect the decentralization or governance of the Internet Computer blockchain itself. While constructive criticism is reasonable, it is also fair to recognize the technical trade-offs required for a blockchain that supports advanced functionality. There are always balances between competing priorities. Rather than dismissing ICP as fundamentally flawed, it may be productive to engage in thoughtful discussion of its goals and architecture.

[kpeacock]

I think the fact that Apollon selected the “censorship at its finest” reply as the “solution” to this post, rather than Sat’s very direct answer of:

500TB
Build Artifacts, nothing used directly by the IC
We can't disclose the price

speaks volumes. The inquiry has been answered, but no answer can be satisfactory if what you want is drama

[Sormarler]

@kpeacock

Build Artifacts, nothing used directly by the IC
We can't disclose the price

Why is this answer unsatisfactory?