Morning.
Firstly, why would I target you, Adam? What have you done? You’ve never wronged me, and I have no reason to target you, or anyone else in the IC community.
Regarding NODAO, I quickly looked them up, and all their information is here: New Node Provider Proposals - #743 by quint
With regards to allegation of my travels to Madrid being connected to the nodes, note that a person doesn’t need to be physically present where the nodes are located—everything can be managed remotely. As for the dates, I have no knowledge of the transfer of nodes from Madrid that you are referring to, but remember Madrid is a capital European city and home to over 3.5 million people. Once again, I have no relationship to NODAO or any node-providing link to any individual or company in Madrid or Miami.
While I do see brilliance in identifying a pattern, I see no brilliance in jumping to a conclusion and feeding a personal paranoia. If one does have concerns, the best course of action would be to investigate properly instead of launching a vicious attack.
How about reaching out to the other individuals and companies? We have some tagged above.
Do you also realise that your accusation undermines IC governance? Every node provider is required to submit real-world identification documents and other verification. Unverified suspicions leading to public accusations only harm the community and ultimately the ICP price.
If node providers, who invest time and resources into contributing, can be attacked without due diligence, who will want to help the ecosystem?