CORRUPTION talk

Did you not read a single thing that I wrote on any of these threads?
“Drain the Swamp”,
“Remove 32 Node Providers”
“SYBILing Nodes…”

Did you not read any response that you got from Bassadone explaining his relationships to all other node providers in these threads above?

Did you not read any of the responses that you got from all 5 of the node providers who are from Eastern Europe answering your questions and accusations in these threads above?

Did you not read any of the information provided by Aviate, WaterNeruon, DOLR AI, and so many others who already provided you with explanations?

All of these people gave you a response, and yet you you still go on making claims that you are right and everyone else is wrong.

The rules for node provider selection and onboarding were established long before CodeGov started getting involved in Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management proposal reviews. We are following the already existing best practices with our reviews. We have long recognized that improvements can be made and have made many suggestions to that effect. Our preference is that a more robust node provider selection and onboarding process is established and have been very vocal about it since long before you starting making your low effort proposals. If you read any of my responses in the threads linked above, you would see a lot of discussion to this effect.

You put together whatever you want and I will be happy to explain. I have nothing to hide.