Why is there a ckUSDC deposit contract on Ethereum but not other gas-efficient chains?

Developers
1

Using the minter helper contract is pretty expensive (~2-3 USD per transaction) to deposit USDC. If there were a ckUSDC deposit contract on Polygon, Optimism, or other networks where there’s native USDC and cheaper fees, bridging would be far less expensive.

2

you can use onesec.to, where you can deposit USDC from Base and Arbitrum directly.

3

Yeah, I saw onesec.to, but I need to do this programmatically (via code). I saw onesec.to but am curious if you have any documentation for it. Also, I need USDC that has some liquidity in pools so that swapping is easy/cheap. As far as I understand, onesec.to’s USDC is a replica/mirror but I’m not sure how recognized it is in the ecosystem, or what value it has since it’s not ckUSDC.

1 Like
4

We have a npm package: onesec-bridge - npm

We have docs too: https://onesec.to/documentation

onesec USDC can handle more throughput than ckUSDC, because of the way the bridge relays transactions!

5

Awesome, looks good. Thanks

1 Like
6

No worries! If you have any question feel free to join the Telegram: Telegram: View @onesecbridge

1 Like