Note that DFINITY has yet to answer this thread considering they are the sole Front End developers and overseers of NNS.
Obscuring information is deceptive…
Note that DFINITY has yet to answer this thread considering they are the sole Front End developers and overseers of NNS.
Obscuring information is deceptive…
In my observation, the conversations have already happened and now these posts have turned into Defamation of Character and full on slander.
Also, according to the prior posts in this thread, @icpmaximalist offered to have conversations with you to discuss your due diligence and you rejected his offer. If you were truly seeking understanding and explanation, then it seems you would have taken him up on the offer. Your claim for transparency through public conversation and his agreement to one on one and small group conversation doesn’t make you more credible and him less credible. He has responded extensively in this thread to questions that have come up and he offered to clarify your questions further.
This seems really defensive for someone that is completely uninvolved. I find it very interesting that you’re referring to stating facts as “defamation of character and full on slander”. Telling.
Your observation is quite clearly flawed - they have not responded to me since I contacted them last (within this very forum), raising concerns regarding discrepancy’s in their neuron fund request, or following up on my DD.
I’m also curious where you’ve seen them address the countless people asking about the work they stole from Cipher Proxy? I’ve seen many questions within this thread & directed at them on social media’s, and no responses.
You saying that I’m associated with a project doesn’t make it so. I’m involved with Synapse, CodeGov, CrowdGov, and ICPMN on Telegram. There is nothing questionable about those projects. Perhaps you disagree with things I’ve said or decisions I’ve made in the past, but that doesn’t make them questionable. It just means we disagree.
Anyway, this conversation is off topic in this thread, so I’ll disengage.
Your involvement in governance itself is questionable let alone these projects which are rooted around it. You can’t have the social layer. Try Solana or ETH or something. ICP doesn’t need Yours or DFINITYs Politics. DFINITY should focus on the code and let builders innovate, not micromanaging them and wasting their time.
Do you know what happened with Community Funds? They removed the information from dashboard. Since you keep track of governance you could answer this?
How is it defensive and why would I need to be defensive? As I said, these are my observations. The slander hasn’t been about me…until now since the Army or Detectives or VIPs or Brigade or whatever you call yourselves are out in full force to attack anyone who says anything.
I can’t answer these questions. I didn’t know there were changes until you said something and I haven’t followed up yet to see what you are talking about. It’s fair for you to ask questions like this, but you typically don’t just ask questions and seek objective answers. When you attack people, it’s not surprising they don’t want to respond.
Just want to say, I don’t think your apart of BoomDAO.
I have said numerous times I think this project can be beneficial to the ecosystem, it’s just not proposed to be beneficial to the community. It’s proposed to line Max & Tommy’s pockets by leveraging other teams names.
Founding Team & Founding partners should drop from 33% to 10%
Work through grants and perform to get paid.
Adjust voting power collectively a bit. It shouldn’t require 7% to override. Maybe 12-15%
80% of the treasury could be spent over a few extra years. Would be much safer. Most games will fail, not saying BoomDAO would… Most games will.
I feel like this offers a safer approach to making the DAO last much longer.
Stof, Ivan, Phasma, Accumulating, and all coordinated attackers.
I have disclosed that there is an interest on the success of Boom DAO (as I am a founding partner), would you all be so kind in disclosing your interest? Do you have any competitive product, on the IC or outside (ETH, SOL, …)?
Are you part of any game and you think you will be left out?
Whatever the reason, hopefully we can find a bridge where we all gain. A DAO is about sharing efforts, not fighting for some kind of supremacy.
It’s not a coordinated attack man. People just don’t like to see the neuron fund being misused. Not everything is a conspiracy theory.
Yeah, okay, fair enough. Please disclose your percentage of your earnings too, considering that’s the heavy bias in you making the effort to even respond here.
I know this will likely be taken down already, so I copied it and will be prepared to DM you if needed.
I’m about to show plenty of info. I’ve already addressed concerns about tokenomics & voting power. It should be noted already how the founding team members and founding partners can collude.
We basically support the project if the tokenomics and voting power are tweaked. It’s crazy that if we suggest working, you freak out. SNS payments should be milestone-based with targets. Not time to unlock directly. Maybe a mix of both.
Even brought up in 2022 by Psychedelic. Why?
ICP Max has a history of leveraging teams’ names and ripping them off. It is in play again, considering several teams didn’t know their project was listed on the BoomDAO Site. Dragginz didn’t even realize they were partnered. Just screams integrity to me, you know?
To respond to your question, thinking this is a coordinated attack, I will say yes. It is at the Community Fund.
Would I be coordinating an attack? More so self-defense. Considering the history of ICP Max.
We have a gaming project - it’s not to build unity games. It’s a multichain gaming hub for eSports & more by leveraging blockchain. It wouldn’t be a competitor to BoomDAO; it would actually complement it & accelerate the growth of gamers. It’s a matter of a lack of trust for ICP Max. (Given history)
We also enable tooling to work with AAA games for tournaments, and faster payments. Which solves issues for the competitive gaming industry. Goated Gamer has a lot more it offers directed towards entertainment. I previously was a Razor Streamer. I’ve connected the first eSports team to the IC. We have other eSports teams we are connected to. We are currently bringing several ETH teams over to the IC. We are partnered with Metaverse projects. I’m a core contributor to the Outpost Metaverse project. I market ICP projects, artists, musicians, and content creators. We contribute a lot to the ecosystem. We also have an extensive multichain news app coming out near 2024 to highlight IC and other projects across Web 3.
Just so you know, Goated Gamer DAO is separate from the Goated Gamer Platform. At this time, we don’t believe we would leverage the SNS.
The Swop compliments Goated & vice versa.
I find it extremely hilarious that you’ve resorted to attempting to portray people negatively to push through your point of view, after the Boom DAO team has so frequently said they’d love to have open conversation.
Again, it’s not a coordinated attack, but rather a failure to accept criticism & reality on the side of your team, which has resulted in a buildup of people taking notice.
Nobody has addressed any of these concerns, regardless of the weight they hold to the success & longevity of the protocol, or the implication to the integrity of the team.
I have absolutely no vested interest - if you did research you’d know I have a history of performing due diligence on every single SNS Project, and publishing them; all of which is completely unpaid work. Furthermore, while researching, you’ll notice I have no correlation to the people you’re accusing me of coordinating attacks with.
Rather than assuming the worst of everyone - reflect.
Is it more likely that 5+ unrelated individuals decided to collude on a singular SNS launch for “personal malicious reasons” (while not having products that would compete with BOOM DAO, while simultaneously receiving backlash for providing criticism), or is it more likely that 5+ individuals think you’ve created a potentially malicious, abusable scenario, in which you can extract liquidity from the Neuron fund & SNS Treasury (while refusing to answer questions once the opportunity to acquire money has arrived)?
Imagine slandering dozens of active members of the community because you can’t fathom they have a different point of view.
Plausible deniability blah
Negativity Blah
DFINITY is such a terrible company. Do you think we’re idiots here have nothing better to do than waste our resources on problems created by you and your insiders?
Entrepot was incubated by ICPMN. These pol~dacts have nothing better to do and won’t let others to build without gatekeeping either. Such irony for Web3…
Guys this was a courtesy post to let you know they’re taking the money.
There is no dao or community and we’ll find this out in the coming year.
I’m confident that between them they easily have enough icp to pump in and rinse the pot if need be.
Energy best conserved for where a difference can be made.
SMH - Censored by the seniors, best post on twitter
I didn’t even see his comments because he didn’t tag me.
No I don’t have to co-ordinate with others to voice my opinion. I don’t have to worry about DFINITY and its affiliates sabotaging me or my projects.
For those that have attention span more than 20 seconds, read this post on why credible neutrality matters for decentralization
+1. (Need more characters)
Also again about the name / branding, on Avax the gaming hub is called Beam theyre launching a PS5 game “” on the blockchain (AWS) “” They are more popular because they have a lot of paid marketing. One is called Beam, and here its called Boom, cant it be something more smooth and original. I still cringe a bit when i hear it, but as its looking its just me thats good.
I just think it should go through some re-branding. As long as i get that cringe feeling, i`ll have to sit this one out and wont paricipate only out of fomo or for pity points.
The underlying idea sounds good tho and wish you all the best success 100%.
I’ve refrained from engaging in drama, it’s not in my nature. But it’s time for the truth to be shared.
It’s clear that you have a personal agenda against Plethora and BOOM DAO considering your close partner and CTO was previously a founder at CipherProxy. You’ve posted in this forum with malicious intentions. It’s clear you view us as a competitor and want to spread FUD about us.
CipherProxy scammed us and leveraged what we built to raise funds from investors. The IC Gallery version control history shows every code commit to the project since August 2021. CipherProxy never contributed a line of code to the IC Gallery. The CipherProxy team had zero Unity experience, so I ended up coding the entire thing.
Their team was inexperienced and junior, and they lacked strong work ethics. They were supposed to help us, but then they failed to deliver anything impactful. Instead, they just leveraged us for social validation. And then they did something dishonest. They leveraged the IC Gallery to raise a substantial seed round from investors (namely Psychedelic), basically convincing investors that they built the IC Gallery. That is why we kicked them out of IC Gallery. Because they went behind our backs and leveraged our product to sell to investors.
After that point, they always held a grudge against us. And we despised them for their dishonesty. They received $100K in grants from Dfinity and didn’t produce anything worthwhile to help the IC community. They wasted everyone’s time and money. And then of course, they abandoned the IC ecosystem.
On the other hand, we kept building. We built Plethora, a real-time multiplayer game with thousands of players. And BOOM DAO, infrastructure and protocols to grow the ICP gaming vertical. Everything we build is open-source to help everyone in the ecosystem. Two years later, and CipherProxy has still failed to build anything meaningful on ICP. Instead, they spend their time attacking us. It’s clear that you’re colluding with CipherProxy and spreading malicious narratives. Your coordinated FUD is visible on twitter and on this forum.
We have posted a tweet that shares our side of the story. Max and I have been a part of the ICP community for many years, this is our passion and life-calling, and we hope to continue to build the ICP gaming vertical for many years to come.