Lol Lmao Even. thousands of players in the room with us now?
You’re here to point fingers like everyone? Lets point one at DFINITY and ask why they started removing community fund information from dashboard and NNS front-end. It also seems that Boom DAO is 50% funded by Community Fund lmao. And the Community Fund doesn’t have a dashboard. Perfect time to launch your DAO… lmao
Sure forum, hide a truthful post.
They can’t even answer why they need 10% just for themselves. Then additional percentages to pay their individual developers and Plethora entity.
Why did DFINITY remove information about Community Funds from Dashboard and NNS front-end?
This is very much relevant to the topic because its important for my DD, to have all of the data and not being misled into making terrible financial decision wrt SNS
As a moderator, it’s my responsibility to ensure that our forum remains a constructive and respectful environment for all participants. Recently, there have been some instances of off-topic discussions, accusations, and inappropriate comments that are not in line with our community guidelines. I want to take this opportunity to remind everyone of our expectations for participation.
Our goal is to foster a welcoming and inclusive space where members can exchange ideas, seek advice, and engage in meaningful discussions. By adhering to these guidelines, we can create a positive and constructive atmosphere for everyone.
Please remember that failure to follow these guidelines may result in warnings or, in severe cases, account suspensions or bans.
Thank you for your cooperation in making this forum a great place for all. Your contributions are valuable, and we appreciate your commitment to maintaining a respectful and on-topic community.
Newsflash: No one cares about DFINITYs diplomacy anymore. Diplomacy and courtesy is for people with their morals intact…
It’s becoming clear at this point that there is a coordinated attack on BOOM DAO coming from people pursuing their hidden agenda. It’s a personal vendetta disguised behind “good intentions for the community”. We have already addressed everything many times on this forum. At this point many people engage here to create drama and clearly not seeking any constructive dialogue. We all have a responsibility to build a healthy community and ecosystem and it starts with how we respect each other and interact together. Bad actors have been identified and we won’t engage with them here anymore. Their personal agenda has been revealed. Thanks for respecting this forum.
This is not the right platform to have an open conversation about financial matters.
It’s clear the Community fund is under attack.
You can’t even address basic treasury needs for your 10% founding benefit. Why are you double benefiting from this sale? Why is there a need to raise 33% between the founding team & founding partners? Why are you leveraging other teams names for your majority benefit?
These are reasonable questions.
Not true…I answered your question with an observation and a statement that wasn’t even about you.
To lighten the mood just a little, I’d like to remind us all that this is a post about an SNS sale that’s hosted on a completely novel blockchain built by some of the best engineers and cryptographers in the world.
The larger crypto community might be better off for it 
(posting memes credit to Meme Fighter app)
Hey @atomikm thanks for this post. I think it was needed and it is reasonable to defend yourself when false accusations are made. I appreciate that you were diplomatic in your statements. It can be very difficult, but please continue to remain civilized even when others are not. Most people are reasonable and appreciate civilized discussion.
Sadly this isn’t a scientific paper this is a conversation about investments and governance.
Thank you for moderating the forums and ensuring everyone is remaining constructive and respectful. This forum has become very heated, and we’d love to focus on civil discussion. The DFINITY team is a class act, and we appreciate your work on maintaining this respectful space for the community to discuss.
Thanks Wenzel, I appreciate this. I’m not a person who seeks out drama. I just felt that our side of the story needed to be heard. I will continue to strive to be diplomatic and civil in my conversations Business can be complex, and people can take things personally. I hope the IC community will continue to grow to be kind to each other, and support each other rather than tear each other down.
Civil and reasoned discourse is essential for progress and for gaining meaningful insights and information. Engaging in thoughtful conversations, respecting diverse perspectives, and focusing on facts and empathy, rather than resorting to conjecture and personal attacks, will foster understanding and create the potential to find common ground.
Based on what continues to happen on this forum and Twitter, I completely understand why the team has avoided engaging in these types of activities and is focusing on building. But, agree with you Wenzel the team did have to respond at this stage to reasonably defend themselves from the numerous accusations.
Hey guys.
This is my first post here.
I have been watching this forum since SNS started.
When Sonic was rejected because “trust me” and “I don’t expect the market to grow”. The foundation and community said it was to manage the Neuron Fund prudently. I personally have a large investment in Sonic so I was disappointed with the outcome but agreed.
Then a meme project called Ghost DAO got the Sonic fund.
Then Seers got SNS funding. This team had no development experience and was “censored” in the community. The users who were so eager to gatecape the other teams did nothing.
EMC was also rejected by the community afterwards, saying “please trust us” and “developers should not take SNS funds”. And now PLETHORA, which has been contributing to the community for a long time, is being attacked with enthusiasm.
Well, DAO is based on the position talk of the community, so I may not be qualified to object to any outcome.
However, from an objective point of view, I think that the current community is contradicting itself in its belief in the proper use of the Neuron Fund and its actual actions.
I have seen forums that have criticized the Neuron Fund as being flawed in its setup.
But do you really think that is the real flaw? The users who remain now are people who have strong beliefs in ICP, and I hope they will rethink their stance on social networking.
Dieses Thema wurde aufgrund einer großen Anzahl an Community-Meldungen vorübergehend für mindestens 4 Stunden geschlossen.
This topic was automatically opened after 8 hours.
