Hey guys.
This is my first post here.
I have been watching this forum since SNS started.
When Sonic was rejected because “trust me” and “I don’t expect the market to grow”. The foundation and community said it was to manage the Neuron Fund prudently. I personally have a large investment in Sonic so I was disappointed with the outcome but agreed.
Then a meme project called Ghost DAO got the Sonic fund.
Then Seers got SNS funding. This team had no development experience and was “censored” in the community. The users who were so eager to gatecape the other teams did nothing.
EMC was also rejected by the community afterwards, saying “please trust us” and “developers should not take SNS funds”. And now PLETHORA, which has been contributing to the community for a long time, is being attacked with enthusiasm.
Well, DAO is based on the position talk of the community, so I may not be qualified to object to any outcome.
However, from an objective point of view, I think that the current community is contradicting itself in its belief in the proper use of the Neuron Fund and its actual actions.
I have seen forums that have criticized the Neuron Fund as being flawed in its setup.
But do you really think that is the real flaw? The users who remain now are people who have strong beliefs in ICP, and I hope they will rethink their stance on social networking.