While some are trying to build projects that offer non-zero sum game products, like games and the crypto equivalent of flower shops. Others are weaponizing projects to carry out a coup d’état. I hope you disable them all with these takeovers.
You just triggered 19% vote on a proposal. Seems you’re the cabal
2 Likes
No Cabal is 51%, that’s really the only figure that matters.
You are the cabal with @infu
Conducting 51% attacks on every dao you can.
1 Like
My move I guess.
You are the one attempting to control the ecosystem. I am just a user. Last I checked narcissist’s will try to make everything theirs while gaslighting others even when presented with valid rebuttals to their points of views.
You now have gold dao following you and your votes. Congrats. Yet you have only shown you are not stopping until you control enough to cripple every dao out there and transition it into something useless for your other power trips.
2 Likes
It sounds more like you are misunderstanding my comments. I already explained this…
As I said, I wish you would read what I have to say objectively instead of filtering through a preconceived lens. Your references an not applicable to this conversation.
Agreed. Why would NNS neuron be needed for anything else? WTN neuron owners should be voting independently or following credible WTN neurons for any WTN proposal that is specific for the WTN SNS. However, the WTN protocol should make it easy for WTN neuron owners to set up a vote relay that enables their WTN neuron to vote according to their preferred NNS neuron specifically on the Vote for NNS Proposals.
You captured it better than me. Thank you.
Hey @Mico. I also want to say thank you for continuing to ask the right questions. It takes courage to stand up to Adam, Anvil, and Alex and I think you have done it well. I’m not understanding at all how they have reached their conclusions, but it’s clear to me that any response I provide is not going to be heard at this point. I wish it were possible to have a civilized conversation with them, but at this point that doesn’t seem possible. I appreciate that you are trying as well.
1 Like
It seems they don’t want to engage in solutions outside of what Adam proposed.
It’s clear that an easy first step is the ability to follow your own nns neurons through the vote relay. I wonder why they are against that. Maybe it interferes with the hostile take over, or the d-quorum being launched.
Either way I’ve laid out the data to show the only way a 51% attack can happen, offered a quick deterrent that can be implemented, and suggested granular voting gets worked on and implemented later when ready.
I am not sure what else they could want unless the end goal is for Adam to have it all.
1 Like
People with common sense: Hey there’s a hole in the bottom of the ship, I think we should patch this up straight away because I don’t want the ship to sink.
You guys: I think we should prioritize swabbing the deck, because that is the easier problem to fix right now. Plus you can’t prove that the ship will fill with water. The data I’m looking at suggests…
o comon have some sense of humor please
2 Likes
It is funny that you say I am the king of strawman when you seem to do it to everything I say..
1 Like
its just more fun this way, because you don’t engage with the honest arguments I make.
So you don’t think implementing a quick fix while the long term one gets worked on and coded is worth while.
So your position is to let the ship remain the same until the dev work for the more complicated solution is done. Sounds like you are arguing to be right and not to find a solution
I think there is no intention by the team to implement a fix because to them it is not a problem, it is the goal.
That is a conspiracy. Or at best an opinion not based on facts or data.
I don’t know why data isn’t important to you when making decisions. It seems emotions are running thought here and it takes away from the small steps we can take to get to the end goal.
1 Like
I have no problem admitting I was wrong if they fix the protocol… what do you say 2 months seems enough time for them to figure out how to split an 8 year neuron into let’s say 100 smaller ones and get them to vote proportionately to the DAO holders don’t you think?
I’d imagine it’s more complicated than that.
I’m not a dev so I wouldn’t be of any value on timelines. But while that gets worked on why are you opposed to something that can help add more security against the concerns of a cabal having 51%?
The data shows that the only way for a 51% attack to happen is through voter following. So if we allow for more individuals to follow their own neurons or even other nns neurons that aren’t related to wtn would offer security to all of the concerns raised.