Subnet Management - 5kdm2 (Application)

[Lorimer]

Proposal 137804 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Down node replaced with an up node. There is a reduction in the average distance between nodes, but key key decentralisation stats are unchanged and remain within the IC Target Topology.

Country Discrepancies (1)

Node	Data Center	Claimed Country	According to ipinfo.io
62yzt	Toronto 2	Canada	United States of America (the)

Claimed location is backed up by globalping

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

	Smallest Distance	Average Distance	Largest Distance
EXISTING	479.703 km	8391.692 km	17077.023 km
PROPOSED	375.992 km (-21.6%)	8164.586 km (-2.7%)	17077.023 km

This proposal slightly reduces decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical reduction in localised disaster resilience).

Subnet characteristic counts →

	Continents	Countries	Data Centers	Owners	Node Providers	Node Operator
EXISTING	5	13	13	13	13	13
PROPOSED	5	13	13	13	13	13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

	Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
EXISTING	5	1	1	1	1	1
PROPOSED	5	1	1	1	1	1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 137147

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description

• Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

• Green marker represents an added node

• Blue marker represents an unchanged node

• Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

• Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

• Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes

Action	Node	Status		Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
Remove	srgrm	DOWN		Asia	India	Panvel 2 (pl2)	Yotta	Krishna Enterprises	7rw6b
Add	zgeaf	UP		Europe	Estonia	Tallinn 2 (ta2)	Telia DC	Artem Horodyskyi	rhtt6

Other Nodes

Node	Status		Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
tu7cd	UP		Oceania	Australia	Melbourne 2 (mn2)	NEXTDC	Icaria Systems Pty Ltd	l5lhp
62yzt	UP		North America	Canada	Toronto 2 (to2)	Cyxtera	Blockchain Development Labs	4lp6i
jtvnx	UP		Europe	Switzerland	Zurich 4 (zh4)	Nine.Ch	Tomahawk.vc	paxme
uouxk	UP		Asia	Georgia	Tbilisi 1 (tb1)	Cloud9	George Bassadone	yhfy4
cbtjz	UP		Europe	Isle of Man	Douglas 2 (im2)	Continent8	Zarety LLC	ylbc3
oswv7	UP		Asia	Japan	Tokyo 3 (ty3)	Equinix	Starbase	a5glg
ttjeo	UP		Asia	Korea (the Republic of)	Seoul 3 (kr1)	KT	Pindar Technology Limited	iubpe
zos66	UP		Europe	Sweden	Stockholm 1 (sh1)	Digital Realty	DFINITY Stiftung	lgp6d
ihoip	UP		Asia	Singapore	Singapore (sg1)	Telin	OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital	d4bin
wq5v7	UP		Europe	Slovenia	Ljubljana (lj1)	Posita.si	Fractal Labs AG	gl27f
haeka	UP		North America	United States of America (the)	Dallas (dl1)	Flexential	87m Neuron, LLC	mw64v
ocvcv	UP		Africa	South Africa	Gauteng 2 (jb2)	Africa Data Centres	Honeycomb Capital (Pty) Ltd	3bohy

---

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

---

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

[timk11]

Proposal 137804 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces node srgrm which appears in the dashboard as “Offline”. The replacement node appears in the dashboard as “Healthy”. As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, API Boundary API Boundary Node Management, Node Admin and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons' Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[ZoLee]

Proposal #137804 — ZoLee | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted

Reason:
Replaces dead node srgrm from PL2 DC in Panvel, India with healthy unassigned node zgeaf from Tallin, Estonia, whitout any change to decentralization.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron's Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[aligatorr89]

Proposal 137804 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces unhealthy node.

• Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient stayed the same as on current topology.

Node Changes 1 removed, 1 added

Node ID	Status	Country	City	Node Provider	Data Center	Data Center Owner
srgrm-5pwg2-225hn-fxwdd-zphpu-wwxgu-uxako-avmlx-epw7e-zwkhf-sqe → zgeaf-fcq4e-fcnht-g7mpg-sb7ff-r6awk-zvkwp-gkloc-rr6jl-ghsse-mqe	DOWN → UP	IN → EE	Panvel → Tallinn	Krishna Enterprises → Artem Horodyskyi	pl2 → ta2	Yotta → Telia DC

Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00

Attribute	Nakamoto Coefficient	Identical attribute values	Max allowed identical values	Unique Counts
Country	5		2	13
Data Center	5		1	13
Data Center Owner	5		1	13
Node Provider ID	5		1	13

Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00

Attribute	Nakamoto Coefficient	Identical attribute values	Max allowed identical values	Unique Counts
Country	5		2	13
Data Center	5		1	13
Data Center Owner	5		1	13
Node Provider ID	5		1	13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

[LaCosta]

Proposal 137804 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal replaces one dead node on subnet 5kdm2:

• Removed Nodes: nodes srgrm, Dashboard Status: Offline

• Added Nodes: nodes zgeaf, Dashboard Status: Healthy and Not assigned to a subnet

The decentralization remains unchanged across all features

The subnet is within the current approved IC Target Topology so no issues here.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron's Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[MalithHatananchchige]

Proposal 137804 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR:
This proposal removes 1 offline node(s) from Panvel 2 and adds 1 replacement node(s) in Tallinn 2, No issues found. I vote to adopt.

Subnet Details

Property	Value
ID	5kdm2…
Type	verified_application
Memory Usage	168.38 GB
Running Canisters	12869
Description	N/A

Provider Changes

Removed	Added
Krishna Enterprises	Artem Horodyskyi

Location Changes

Removed	Added
Asia, Panvel 2	Europe, Tallinn 2

Nodes Removed 1

Node ID	Status	Provider	Data Center	Location
srgrm…	DOWN	Krishna Enterprises	pl2	Panvel 2

Nodes Added 1

Node ID	Status	Provider	Data Center	Location
zgeaf…	UNASSIGNED	Artem Horodyskyi	ta2	Tallinn 2

Passes:

Node srgrm…: Health check passed.

Node srgrm…: Remove from Subnet check passed.

Node zgeaf…: Replacement Status check passed.

Node zgeaf…: Not assigned to any subnet.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

[DRE-Team]

A new proposal with ID 137913 has been submitted, please take a look.

Click here to open proposal details

Replace a node in subnet 5kdm2

Motivation:
Replacing a dead node

Decentralization Nakamoto coefficient changes for subnet 5kdm2-62fc6-fwnja-hutkz-ycsnm-4z33i-woh43-4cenu-ev7mi-gii6t-4ae:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
          country: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto comparison: 5.00 → 5.00 (+0%)

Overall replacement impact: equal decentralization across all features

Details

Nodes removed:

• ttjeo-6vece-x2hpb-lzmdg-b2fwl-7osa4-r5vb6-n4dyc-ocg5r-rztx2-eqe [health: dead]

Nodes added:

• 2c4nq-s43ex-jhm42-4tczp-mugkx-n57at-a7skw-ruhmb-qfj3j-g7vfi-yqe [health: healthy]

    node_provider                                                              data_center            data_center_owner              area                 country        
    -------------                                                              -----------            -----------------              ----                 -------        
    6nbcy-kprg6-ax3db-kh3cz-7jllk-oceyh-jznhs-riguq-fvk6z-6tsds-rqe       1    an1          0 -> 1    Africa Data Centres       1    Douglas         1    AU            1
    7at4h-nhtvt-a4s55-jigss-wr2ha-ysxkn-e6w7x-7ggnm-qd3d5-ry66r-cae       1    dl1               1    Cloud9                    1    Flanders   0 -> 1    BE       0 -> 1
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe       1    im2               1    Continent8                1    Gauteng         1    CA            1
    diyay-s4rfq-xnx23-zczwi-nptra-5254n-e4zn6-p7tqe-vqhzr-sd4gd-bqe       1    jb2               1    Cyxtera                   1    Ljubljana       1    CH            1
    eipr5-izbom-neyqh-s3ec2-52eww-cyfpg-qfomg-3dpwj-4pffh-34xcu-7qe       1    kr1          1 -> 0    Datacenter United    0 -> 1    Melbourne       1    EE            1
    g7dkt-aapqq-j3hqt-xtiys-pwapz-idulp-nwagd-zibqm-caxa4-gc23t-3qe  0 -> 1    lj1               1    Digital Realty            1    Ontario         1    GE            1
    glrjs-2dbzh-owbdd-fpp5e-eweoz-nsuto-e3jmk-tl42c-wem4f-qfpfa-qqe       1    mn2               1    Equinix                   1    Seoul      1 -> 0    IM            1
    ihbuj-erwnc-tkjux-tqtnv-zkoar-uniy2-sk2go-xfpkc-znbb4-seukm-wqe       1    sg1               1    Flexential                1    Singapore       1    JP            1
    nmdd6-rouxw-55leh-wcbkn-kejit-njvje-p4s6e-v64d3-nlbjb-vipul-mae       1    sh1               1    KT                   1 -> 0    Stockholm       1    KR       1 -> 0
    r3yjn-kthmg-pfgmb-2fngg-5c7d7-t6kqg-wi37r-j7gy6-iee64-kjdja-jae  1 -> 0    ta2               1    NEXTDC                    1    Tallinn         1    SE            1
    sixix-2nyqd-t2k2v-vlsyz-dssko-ls4hl-hyij4-y7mdp-ja6cj-nsmpf-yae       1    tb1               1    Nine.Ch                   1    Tbilisi         1    SG            1
    ucjqj-jmbj3-rs4aq-ekzpw-ltjs3-zrcma-t6r3t-m5wxc-j5yrj-unwoj-mae       1    to2               1    Posita.si                 1    Texas           1    SI            1
    vegae-c4chr-aetfj-7gzuh-c23sx-u2paz-vmvbn-bcage-pu7lu-mptnn-eqe       1    ty3               1    Telia DC                  1    Tokyo           1    US            1
    wdjjk-blh44-lxm74-ojj43-rvgf4-j5rie-nm6xs-xvnuv-j3ptn-25t4v-6ae       1    zh4               1    Telin                     1    Zurich          1    ZA            1

[Lorimer]

Proposal 137913 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces a down node for an up node. There is increased clustering within Europe, and a slight reduction in the average distance between nodes, but the IC Target Topology is respected.

Country Discrepancies (1)

The discrepancy appears to be an issue with ipinfo. Ping testing has consistently backed up the claimed location of BDL nodes.

Node	Data Center	Claimed Country	According to ipinfo.io
62yzt	Toronto 2	Canada	United States of America (the)

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

	Smallest Distance	Average Distance	Largest Distance
EXISTING	375.992 km	8164.586 km	17077.023 km
PROPOSED	375.992 km	7801.041 km (-4.5%)	17077.023 km

This proposal slightly reduces decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical reduction in localised disaster resilience).

Subnet characteristic counts →

	Continents	Countries	Data Centers	Owners	Node Providers	Node Operator
EXISTING	5	13	13	13	13	13
PROPOSED	5	13	13	13	13	13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

	Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
EXISTING	5	1	1	1	1	1
PROPOSED	6 (+20%)	1	1	1	1	1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 137147

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description

• Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

• Green marker represents an added node

• Blue marker represents an unchanged node

• Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

• Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

• Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes

Action	Node	Status		Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
Remove	ttjeo	DOWN		Asia	Korea (the Republic of)	Seoul 3 (kr1)	KT	Pindar Technology Limited	iubpe
Add	2c4nq	UP		Europe	Belgium	Antwerp (an1)	Datacenter United	NODAO	k4aor

Other Nodes

Node	Status		Continent	Country	Data Center	Owner	Node Provider	Node Operator
tu7cd	UP		Oceania	Australia	Melbourne 2 (mn2)	NEXTDC	Icaria Systems Pty Ltd	l5lhp
62yzt	UP		North America	Canada	Toronto 2 (to2)	Cyxtera	Blockchain Development Labs	4lp6i
jtvnx	UP		Europe	Switzerland	Zurich 4 (zh4)	Nine.Ch	Tomahawk.vc	paxme
zgeaf	UP		Europe	Estonia	Tallinn 2 (ta2)	Telia DC	Artem Horodyskyi	rhtt6
uouxk	UP		Asia	Georgia	Tbilisi 1 (tb1)	Cloud9	George Bassadone	yhfy4
cbtjz	UP		Europe	Isle of Man	Douglas 2 (im2)	Continent8	Zarety LLC	ylbc3
oswv7	UP		Asia	Japan	Tokyo 3 (ty3)	Equinix	Starbase	a5glg
zos66	UP		Europe	Sweden	Stockholm 1 (sh1)	Digital Realty	DFINITY Stiftung	lgp6d
ihoip	UP		Asia	Singapore	Singapore (sg1)	Telin	OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital	d4bin
wq5v7	UP		Europe	Slovenia	Ljubljana (lj1)	Posita.si	Fractal Labs AG	gl27f
haeka	UP		North America	United States of America (the)	Dallas (dl1)	Flexential	87m Neuron, LLC	mw64v
ocvcv	UP		Africa	South Africa	Gauteng 2 (jb2)	Africa Data Centres	Honeycomb Capital (Pty) Ltd	3bohy

---

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

---

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

[aligatorr89]

Proposal 137913 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces unhealthy node.

• Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient stayed the same as on current topology.

Node Changes 1 removed, 1 added

Node ID	Status	Country	City	Node Provider	Data Center	Data Center Owner
ttjeo-6vece-x2hpb-lzmdg-b2fwl-7osa4-r5vb6-n4dyc-ocg5r-rztx2-eqe → 2c4nq-s43ex-jhm42-4tczp-mugkx-n57at-a7skw-ruhmb-qfj3j-g7vfi-yqe	DOWN → UP	KR → BE	Seoul → Flanders	Pindar Technology Limited → NODAO	kr1 → an1	KT → Datacenter United

Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00

Attribute	Nakamoto Coefficient	Identical attribute values	Max allowed identical values	Unique Counts
Country	5		2	13
Data Center	5		1	13
Data Center Owner	5		1	13
Node Provider ID	5		1	13

Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00

Attribute	Nakamoto Coefficient	Identical attribute values	Max allowed identical values	Unique Counts
Country	5		2	13
Data Center	5		1	13
Data Center Owner	5		1	13
Node Provider ID	5		1	13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

[timk11]

Proposal 137913 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces node ttjeo which appears in the dashboard as “Offline”. The replacement node appears in the dashboard as “Healthy”. As shown in the proposal and verified using the DRE tool, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, API Boundary API Boundary Node Management, Node Admin and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons' Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[ZoLee]

Proposal #137913 — ZoLee | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted

Reason:
Replaces dead node ttjeo from KR1 DC in Seoul with healthy unassigned node 2c4nq from Belgium without any change to decentralization.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron's Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[MalithHatananchchige]

Proposal 137913 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR:
This proposal removes 1 offline node(s) from Seoul 3 and adds 1 replacement node(s) in Antwerp.
All nodes are in the correct state for their respective actions. Decentralized stats remain the same. I vote to adopt.

Subnet Details

Property	Value
ID	5kdm2…
Type	verified_application
Memory Usage	166.49 GB
Running Canisters	12881
Description	N/A

Provider Changes

Removed	Added
Pindar Technology Limited	NODAO

Location Changes

Removed	Added
Asia, Seoul 3	Europe, Antwerp

Nodes Removed 1

Node ID	Status	Provider	Data Center	Location
ttjeo…	DOWN	Pindar Technology Limited	kr1	Seoul 3

Nodes Added 1

Node ID	Status	Provider	Data Center	Location
2c4nq…	UNASSIGNED	NODAO	an1	Antwerp

Passes:

Node ttjeo…: Health check passed.

Node ttjeo…: Remove from Subnet check passed.

Node 2c4nq…: Replacement Status check passed.

Node 2c4nq…: Not assigned to any subnet.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

• Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
• Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
• Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

[LaCosta]

Proposal 137913 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal replaces one dead node on subnet 5kdm2:

• Removed Nodes: nodes ttjeo, Dashboard Status: Offline

• Added Nodes: nodes 2c4nq, Dashboard Status: Healthy and Not assigned to a subnet

The decentralization remains unchanged across all features

The subnet is within the current approved IC Target Topology so no issues here.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron's Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

[Cris.MntYetti]

Proposal 137913 - Cris.MntYetti | CodeGov

Replace a node in subnet 5kdm2
Motivation: Replacing a dead node

VOTE: ADOPT

Review:

No violations to the current IC Target Topology

Removed node ttjeo is Offline

dashboard screenshot

Proposed node 2c4nq is Healthy and currently not assigned to any subnet

dashboard screenshot

Node reward type set for the proposed node matches the node operator rewardable nodes

node record

ic-admin get-node 2c4nq-s43ex-jhm42-4tczp-mugkx-n57at-a7skw-ruhmb-qfj3j-g7vfi-yqe --json
Using NNS URLs: [“https://ic0.app/”\]
{
“key”: “node_record_2c4nq-s43ex-jhm42-4tczp-mugkx-n57at-a7skw-ruhmb-qfj3j-g7vfi-yqe”,
“version”: 52255,
“value”: {
“xnet”: “[2001:920:401a:1708:6801:19ff:fe50:f8c8]:2497”,
“http”: “[2001:920:401a:1708:6801:19ff:fe50:f8c8]:8080”,
“node_operator_id”: “k4aor-vlk45-2i4fz-pp3cs-nu5jg-35nva-ftbjl-7fxfd-fks6n-6taxd-4qe”,
“chip_id”: null,
“hostos_version_id”: “143a635e2af0f574e1ea0f795f8754dfbd86c0c0”,
“public_ipv4_config”: null,
“domain”: null,
“node_reward_type”: “type1.1”
}
}

node operator record

ic-admin get-node-operator k4aor-vlk45-2i4fz-pp3cs-nu5jg-35nva-ftbjl-7fxfd-fks6n-6taxd-4qe --json
Using NNS URLs: [“https://ic0.app/”\]
{
“key”: “node_operator_record_k4aor-vlk45-2i4fz-pp3cs-nu5jg-35nva-ftbjl-7fxfd-fks6n-6taxd-4qe”,
“version”: 49530,
“value”: {
“node_operator_principal_id”: “k4aor-vlk45-2i4fz-pp3cs-nu5jg-35nva-ftbjl-7fxfd-fks6n-6taxd-4qe”,
“node_allowance”: 0,
“node_provider_principal_id”: “g7dkt-aapqq-j3hqt-xtiys-pwapz-idulp-nwagd-zibqm-caxa4-gc23t-3qe”,
“dc_id”: “an1”,
“rewardable_nodes”: {
“type1.1”: 14
},
“ipv6”: null,
“max_rewardable_nodes”: {}
}
}

Discrepancies found in this subnet

Node reward type mismatch

The following nodes have node_reward_type set to type1, but their corresponding node operator rewardable_nodes is set to type1.1:

62yzt-726hf-rwk73-c3j6k-fjdls-7oqh5-exbnn-bvrsn-2soat-m4vg3-7ae
ihoip-fmbnl-mm4fa-pu7hu-2sbx2-mzl2f-tgzje-unnjg-bgcac-3apmo-gqe
zos66-lmcn7-satbv-gcdzj-q3cdf-4n6zc-2hlei-gc453-uoh7r-4sj3w-vqe
oswv7-a355p-a5jlp-ko7pj-arrs2-rghho-dti4z-xgptn-szn55-jjr46-uqe
jtvnx-kem2o-icln6-b4oy6-n5ru5-dmksj-dfk5i-4ejvq-k3unp-47gjb-mae
wq5v7-ngito-7ztqs-zlf2v-ibk6f-e54em-t3hou-x24kz-v5j77-6vo72-kqe

---

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron's Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.