The subnet has been halted (that’s what the latest proposal was about). The next step is to establish a catch up package for the subnet.
Fault tolerance | Internet Computer
The claim that ICP is unstoppable means that no jurisdiction (or even handful of jurisdictions) and/or data centres have the power to stop a subnet. In this sense, this claim is a fair portrayal of the tech. It’s obvious that this is a figure of speech though (nothing is truly unstoppable).
ICP tech moves fast. The rate of commits and progress is truly impressive. The downside of moving fast is that sometimes you break things (there’s an intentional trade-off being struck here). Moving fast means the IC is likely to get to a point sooner where many of these things will be capable of being automated. I’d love to see failover subnets, automated proposal submission for Subnet Management fixes etc. This sort of thing will make ICP even more unstoppable, but it requires lots of dev work to get to that stage (and occasionally breaking things along the way is inevitable).