How can we launch on a subnet that doesn’t have any DOLR AI canisters? Is this an option? We’ll need our own subnet for the upcoming NFT thing we’re making.
You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.
CO.DELTA
We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:
Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.
Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.
TLDR : LGTM, I concur with @aligatorr89. A verified application subnet with very low memory usage and very few canisters is being made public. The reasoning for this proposal can be found here, and the most recent prior proposal of this sort is this one.
There are two principals with explicit permission to deploy to this subnet (pr42y and qdjzi). Once this proposal passes, anyone will be able to deploy to this subnet.
You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.
CO.DELTA â–ł
We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:
Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.
Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.
“Proposal 135993? Oh. My. God. Absolute masterwork.”
Listen, I’m no expert—I still think “subnet” is a type of bread—but even I can see that what Lorimer has done here is transcendent. I read the words “verified application subnet with low memory” and I got chills. Literal goosebumps. This is not just governance, it’s art.
This proposal doesn’t just flip a flag from false ⇒ true—it flips the entire paradigm. Public subnet? With permissionless deployment? That’s freedom. That’s vision. That’s Lorimer.
People talk about “decentralization” like it’s some buzzword, but Lorimer lives it. He’s like the Satoshi of verified subnets. The Elon of proposal toggling. If there was a Nobel Prize for Canister Management, he’d win it, and then politely decline it in favor of a DAO vote.
The choice to include the memory usage stat (“0.002 GB”) is nothing short of genius. So humble. So technically profound. I don’t know what it means, but I know it’s good. That’s less than my Tamagotchi used and that thing was efficient.
And the fact that he backed up his position with hyperlinked sources? Don’t even get me started. That’s how you build trust in a post-truth world.
If you’re not voting YES, I can only assume you hate progress, puppies, and possibly democracy itself.
This was at the launch time, when everyone was quite conservative and concerned about potential gaps that may exist in the platform so it was considered safer to have specific known entity on a subnet. Since then the IC matured quite a bit, and today there is a concept of a “subnet rental”, where one can get a subnet but needs to pay for the complete cycle usage on the subnet. Beside that, there is currently no way to get a dedicated subnet.
It’s possible to get “not highly used” subnet. But that’s not the same of course.
Why do you feel you need a dedicated subnet @borovan ?
KongSwap runs on a regular (public) subnet and they don’t seem to have many problems due to this.
What’s the architecture you plan to have for the NFT marketplace? Hopefully not one with a huge number of canisters?
TLDR:
As per motion proposal submitted to increase capacity for public subnet. Find no issue in the current proposal to make w4asl public. Vote to Adpot
You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.
CO.DELTA
We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:
Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.
Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.
Reason: The proposal updates the “List of public subnets” by adding verified application subnet w4asl that is now set to Public. All the 13 nodes are healthy and the size of the State is 1.88 MiBwith currently 167 cannisters.
About CodeGov
CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.
Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.
This proposal changes subnet w4asl from private to public. This subnet currently has a state size of only 1.88 MiB and the change is in keeping with the process outlined here.
About CodeGov
CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons’ Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.
Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.
The proposal updates the list of public subnets by changing verified application subnet w4asl from private to public. The subnet has a state size 1.88 MiB obviously lower then the threshold of 400 GiB.
About CodeGov
CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.
Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.
