My final submission in regards to the NNS, rewards, dead neurons, activity and spam.
Reading the many discussions put forward over a long period of time I have a proposal that I hope meets all the concerns brought forward from the past to current that I feel need to be addressed.
The first point to consider is about neuron holders. There seems to be 3 types of owners that have focus.
Inactive or Following Neurons
Any neurons added to the NNS have decisions made about the level of rewards due to the quantity of icp and the length of staked time that they will receive for the owner. This should be upheld as any class action or court decisions may be at the cost of the voters on the NNS and not Dfinity.
This would apply to Dead, Inactive and Followers neurons.
Any extra rewards should then be given to the Active neurons.
The Followers list should only have groups that are approved by the active neurons and to Dfinity approved groups to update the NNS.
The NNS should have a link to this forum for nominations and discussions put up for changes to the Followers List and NNS updates for Active neuron holders to participate for extra rewards.
This is achieved by conversing on discussions and voting by Active neuron holders that are in the category of Governance. Voting power would apply as per the structure set out in the NNS and a neuron settings for investment return.
Governance discussions allow active neurons owners to put up discussions and would have a voting scale that when the levels of 75% has been achieved or as stated by the NNS the votes are transferred to the NNS for updating without further voting.
Any spam would have to come through the forum and I would assume that spam would not produce a result and be rejected.
The default cost of a rejected proposal on the NNS set to 1 billion so any hacks would fail and all updates for the NNS by the Approve Followers List must also come through the Governance discussion but all Follower neurons votes must be included in the voting.
As for the argument about a resubmit of the owners neurons to Follow after a set period must be avoided.
This is my suggestion to fix the spam concerns but to include all the issues raised to get all active neurons involved with their concerns included.
This is my read on all the topics on this subject over time and I have bundled it all together as a possible solution not the rule.