Sure, agreed but just as a starting point we should pin some facts to start of. Alex has his stance on most things while Adam has his believes set in stone about bad NP’s . I would very much like to address some concerns raised by ICP Hub Poland’s lead @krzysztofzelazko and none the less the issues raised by @ritvick here while also reminding everyone that this current GRANT is/was supposed to be a temporary solution. It was never about any NP’s attack against the whole IC network nor the split to fork another network for Yral as stated unfortunatley by Adam. Attack against Codegov was purely based on Alex’s take on how funds should be distributed and that escalated with the Synapse issue. I do stand by CodeGov 100% and never ever had any internal issues regarding anything. I tried my best to part ways with Alex as best as I could even though I agreed that all he did was question every Dfinity made choice and try to find reasons to reject proposals that were technically correct but lacked summary and or such just stalling the inevitable. Seeing him lower his standards was the last drop in the bucket and should be obvious to anyone following proposals and not just to Dfinity. His last stand against the Swiss subnet is pretty much all you need to figure out his angle. So yeah open to a civilised debate that should have nothing to do with the developer forum, even though there are some aspects regarding mainly education working group that I would like to address as well.
2 Likes