Hey @borovan since you clearly own enough voting power to control this SNS now and you are actively making changes without input from existing community members, why don’t you change the voting period so it doesn’t take 7 days to execute a proposal? You have the power to reduce that voting period to 1 day or 10 minutes or whatever is the minimum. Why not just get on with it if you are not concerned with decentralization or community input?
In fact, why not change the tokenomics so you can quickly earn enough maturity to actually own 51% without having to buy more tokens? Here is an example of the parameters you have the power to control that will give you max control almost immediately. Make it so expensive to submit a proposal so you are the only person who can afford to make a proposal. Then jack up the max dissolve delay so you are the only person who would be interested in maximizing rewards. Then enable governance rewards so you can pay yourself high governance rewards.
Or just mint yourself more tokens in one proposal.
My hope is that DFINITY (@lara @aterga @Andre-Popovitch) will use this SNS takeover as a case study for how to improve the SNS framework to help ensure that they remain decentralized over time. A large token owner can easily take over an SNS with way less than 51% token ownership. They can paralyze an SNS with just 20% token ownership as evidenced by NFID due to the definition of critical proposals and the fact that DFINITY and VCs are large token holders from the Neuron’s Fund who actively choose not to vote for legal/tax reasons. A large token holder can easily change the tokenomics parameters in their favor as described above. The type of proposal that enables these tokenomics changes is not even considered a critical proposal with a higher threshold to pass, but it is probably the only proposal type that really should be a critical proposal.
Anyway…