Do you agree that what you quote as your concern is
- already the case in today’s design and
- would also be the case if we implemented a reset of following instead of the design proposed here?
Already today “a neuron which votes on all proposals on a given day will receive the pro-rata share in terms of total NNS voting power of the total daily available rewards.” (from the post you also quoted)
In particular, this total NNS voting power includes the sleepers’ voting power.
If you agree with this, are you then just saying that you think this aspect of the governance is not good?
If this is not really a distinguishing factor between the options we discuss here, I’d rather have a separate discussion on this. It seems to me that none of the options exclude changing this later if the NNS wishes to do so.