Did we find out why the shady WaterNeuron unilaterally voted No on this proposal?
1 Like
Why couldnāt you just create a new thread ? Would have been so simple so elegant.
1 Like
The irony is ripe but Iāll avoid the low hanging fruit.
I told you my background, not as a āflexā but so maybe you would have some perspective as to why I have the ideologies and opinions that I do. I assure you that everything I post is my own opinion, colored by my own life experiences, which clearly are different than yours. We may not agree, thatās fine. But I donāt feel Iāve done anything to earn your animosity.
Maybe you could help me out and point me to what I did that makes you so angry?
Unfortunately given the nature of the geography of the world. The fact that there is an ocean between us, and my obligations to my employment, that is not practical for me.
If I have wronged you personally in some way, I am happy to discuss it with you. All I did in this thread, was ask for your opinion because I considered you a subject matter expert. and your response was to attack my character. I have no idea why you chose to do this. But since you chose to do so publicly I am responding publicly.
Rather than walking back your character attack, you persist, despite my efforts to respond candidly. You can continue this way, but hereās some free advice (Itās not going well for you).
@Severin please unhide, all of @ZackDS posts in this thread. I think his contributions to this discussion have been valuable and clarify his stance in the community.
Easy, you lied about wenzel voting to reject this proposal, you spread fud about code gov and wtn, you cheated the inflation rate by funding ysyms to spam the nns.
3 Likes
WaterNeuron rejected the proposal, I donāt know why but I know itās controlled by a small group of insiders and Wenzel defends it.
CodeGov has been set up to maximise voting power to a group of people that are not aligned with the ICās best interests. Thatās not FUD itās truth.
Cheated the inflation rate? What?
1 Like
You voted to reject it.
If you had not voted to reject it would still have a chance to pass. Why donāt you explain why you decided to push the rejection over the edge for the wtn vote.
2 Likes
Waterneuron rejected this proposal - they are clear against good for ICP
Adam rejected it lol
I already said this.
I know WTN is controlled so I just vote no and sometimes yes depending on how i feel. If the vote mattered Iād give it more than 1ms of thought.
Me voting on NNS : 8%
Me voting on WaterNeuron : 7% of 1% where the 7% means nothing.
1 Like
In this case your vp is a major part of the reason it got rejected lol.
Yup sure, just like when you voted with 67.007%
1 Like
I wonder if you know this but, between you Dfinity and the ica neurons you three own ~ 39% of vp on the nns.
Why donāt we ever discuss this threat vector?
But in the end you canāt sit here and spin narratives after you voted to reject the proposal and weāre a key vote to push the dao to vote no. Next time vote responsibly then you can sit there and ask questions to the other members who voted no on it.
This is so irresponsible. You can do better. Just follow DFINITY if you arenāt going to take your governance responsibility seriously.
Here is their WTN neuron ID: 0c9288198b6dc21da28113a842f1c6cb4248eb54273f1b2702c12afbeb5b416f.
Here is proof: OpenChat
1 Like
Sounds like a projection after being exposed for the way you voted in wtn for this.
2 Likes
So you guys @Swiss_Subnet are working with DFINITY Foundation and their UTOPIA project? They are okay with you guys creating a brand around ICP subnets hosted in switzerland?
I still do not understand. Your responses lack clarity