Erm no heās a great dev. I just invested in most SNSes to help the ecosystem. Those guys had gratitude and helped me out, and as a result Iām happy I was there to fund them.
Good luck with thatā¦itās cute that you think you are making an impact. Unless DFINITY decides to make major changes to the definition of liquid democracy, you wonāt change my goal of helping advance decentralization of the NNS and specific SNS projects in credible and reliable ways. Iām confident that Iām on the right side of history on this one.
2 Likes
Advance centralisation you mean. Youāve been coveting voting power since day one, with no skin in the game.
ummm guys, this thread is about a swiss subnet.
can we stop arguing about who voted what and discuss why or why not this should be passed? I am curious to know thoughts of people more knowledgable than me about subnet architecture and what the ramifications of this passing would be ( I have no clue!)
2 Likes
This stared because Adam made a claim of wenzel voting to reject this proposal under wtn dao. When in fact Adam rejected the proposal to spin this narrative.
Ask Adam why he voted to reject in wtn but accept on his personal nns neuron.
2 Likes
What @Mico saidā¦ ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦
Hey @Leadership, why was Micoās comment hidden.
1 Like
I agree that the topic was derailed. Iām not particularly concerned as to who or how it was derailed because it happens so much.
I just want to know from people like @Lorimer, @ZackDS, @timk11 , @LaCosta ā¦ what are the implications of this passing? Because I donāt understand it enough to make an informed decision or even begin to form an opinion.
If you are a subnet topology expert I didnāt leave you out as a slight, those are just the names I see in the subnet threads, and clearly know what theyāre talking about more than this rabble. (myself included).
so can we please cut the noise and let the experts chime in?
1 Like
The proposal was already executed 9 hours ago. SO PLEASE STOP SPAMMING every thread, we all know you are one of Adams trollās that managed to turn this thread as well into a mess, again showing disrespect not only to Swiss_Subnet and Dfinity but everyone !!!
It has no implications to you. Maybe if you took the time and actually read something instead of writing useless spam you may actually have a clue about why " the swiss subnet is in the target topology" and SRC.
3 Likes
Sorry? do you know who I am?
Hi my name is Dan, Iām a Soldier by profession and an enjoyer of building websites and writing software by hobby.
I am not employed, paid, have any financial connection to, borovan or anyone else on this forum for that matter. I am vocal on this forum because I believe I represent a unique voice that is not represented by the majority of people who post here. And of course I have my own 8 year interests.
I asked for your opinion on the implications for this proposal because I care. I know it was excecuted, I thought that YOU as a respected contributor to this community might care to share your expert opinion on why this would improve the network. But if you find it beneath yourself, you are not required to respond to me.
It is hubris like yours, and a lack of basic English written into technical proposals that make governance decisions impossible for regular people. But I am the problem because one time I wrote some words you didnāt like. right?
If you donāt like my posts, Iām sorry. I follow the same rules as everyone else who posts in this forum.
4 Likes
I would personally like to see all the off topic comments moved to one of the threads focusing on liquid staking decentralisation. Good shout on trying to get things back on track @WebTreeSoftwareSolut. In the future you could trying reaching out to @aligatorr89 and @MalithHatananchchige for questions too, theyāre very involved in voting on subnet management proposals, and are also members of CO.DELTA.
I think @fxgstās post clarified the direct consequences of this proposal. Funds have been reserved by this proposal for renting the new subnet (which doesnāt exist yet).
The interesting bits will be the node onboarding proposals, particularly given the upheaval and proposed changes in that area.
Thanks @fxgst, am I right in expecting that at most only one node in the new subnet can be owned by the Swiss Subnet AG, who cannot be a UBO connected to any of the other nodes?
Is there any more detailed information anywhere about the strategy for encouraging more nodes to be onboarded by separate independent entities? Will new Node Providers need to be onboarded, or just new nodes from existing Node Providers?
4 Likes
Your replies to queries in this thread sound very corpo-raty
As per my understanding, a group of experts (you @Swiss_Subnet ) want to create a brand around Subnets hosted in Switzerland?
Like GDPR? I do not understand what the innovation here is
PS: Iāve done a 5 minute research on external links you provided and the socials you shared
My opinion ā Bearish due to lack of clarity and credible information in the posts here and socials.
Okay you guys are collaborating with DFINITY Foundation and UTOPIA behind closed doors for these centralized subnets.
https://dashboard.internetcomputer.org/proposal/136408
The proposal ^.
Then where is your rationale? I believe @WebTreeSoftwareSolut is asking for a RATIONALE here.
Unless you are against discussions and trasnparency, Zack DShi
So far I can see @Micoās spammy comments on this thread like every other thread. And DFINITYās moderators enabling these double standards as usual
2 Likes
@Lorimer , thanks for raising this question. It is indeed an important point that we only mentioned in the white paper so letās elaborate:
Node Provider Independence
None of the thirteen proposed node providers will be connected to the Swiss Subnet AG in any capacity ā whether as an ultimate beneficial owner (UBO), technology provider, or in any other role.
Onboarding New Node Providers
Ten new node providers in Switzerland and three in Liechtenstein will be onboarded through the NNS standard operating procedure.
Current Deployment and Centralization
Currently, Switzerland has 185 IC nodes across 9 data centers in only two cities (Geneva and Zurich). We aim to decentralize this network by adding nodes in nine additional cantons as well as in Liechtenstein.
3 Likes
Tell me what I lied about, what I cheated, and what FUD i spread, please.
1 Like
Iāll let the public on this forum be the judge of that. Apparently the moderators disagree with you because they keep allowing my posts to go through. Seems maybe others disagree with your assessment of my contributions.
I donāt even have to respond to anything youāve said here, youāve already assassinated yourself politically. Where does your anger with me stem from? Iāve never even talked to you.