Help! Total of 71106.36 ICP Tokens of Pre-Sale Investment Not Received for 3 months. Request for DFINITY OFFICIAL and DFINITY Foundation to Assist Investigation

Hello, everyone. I’m a unit from Hong Kong,We participated in the Pre-sale round of DFINITY in 2018. Our account has not received any ICP tokens for the past three months since February 2022.

We did a KYC verification through the email link sent by the project party in June 2021, and binded the wallet address used for the pre-sale round. Our KYC-certified wallet address is: e0b0(e0b07d90f2a350996427c300cc9917f74320fd21f7f5d5bd33e3d10c2d6f7110). Every month, we would receive ICP tokens sent by account e97e(e97e61e313c1a3833b817eb92b761eef648d55368a9f460495276b847cb49926). However we did not receive it in February, March and April of 2022. Thus, we checked the transaction records of account e97e and found some problems:

  1. The Pre-sale tokens are not credited directly to our KYC account, but to account e97e first, and subsequently to our account e0b0;

  2. Account e97e did not transfer ICP to our KYC account e0b0 in February, March and April 2022. However, account e97e transferred 23702 ICPs to an account 9916 on 2022/3/17 06:52:44 UTC and 2022/4/12 17:09 respectively. But account 9916 is not ours.

Our question is: Why are the monthly pre-sale ICP neuron-unlocked tokens not directly sent to our KYC account e0b0 every month, but transferred to our KYC account via an intermediate account e97e that is susceptible to human intervention?

On February 26, 2022, we reported the situation to through Mr. Herbert, our person-in-charge in China. After support replied us via email on March 15, they went silent. As of today, the 16th of April, our doubts still have not been resolved.

This is my proposal:Internet Computer Network Status

Request DFINITY OFFICIAL and DFINITY Foundation for assistance in investigating the following:

  1. Is the account e97e officially controlled by the DFINITY OFFICIAL?

  2. If the account e97e is not officially controlled by the DFINITY OFFICIAL could the foundation provide evidence? Who controls this account and how it is created? This is of utmost importance to us. We need this evidence to continue to trace the ICP that has not arrived,For example, recovery through national legal institutions, but evidence needs to be collected,If you need the information provided KYC by me, you can cooperate at any time,Thank you!

大家好,我是来自香港的一家单位,我们参与了2018年Dfinity的Pre-sale round,我们的账号从2022年2月份开始已经有三期没有收到ICP。


1、Pre-sale token没有直接发放到我们的kyc账号,而是先发放到账号e97e,再发到我的kyc账号e0b0;

2、账号e97e在2022年2月份、3月份、4月份没有将icp转我的kyc账号e0b0,并且账号e97e分别在2022/3/17 06:52:44 UTC和2022/4/12 17:09:21 UTC转了23702icp到账号9916,但是账号9916不是我们的;



这是我发起提案:Internet Computer Network Status

请求Dfinity官方和Dfinity Foundation协助调查以下内容:




This is terrible. I hope the official can help me to check it carefully.

Why would you submit this as an NNS proposal?


hi, I am one token holder of icp as well, i am just wondering if your problem has been solved or still unsolved?

At present, the foundation is already investigating, and I would like to thank Mr. Herbert, Asia GM, for his help.


says it right there in the post that official dfinity support stopped responding and went silent months ago, so this probably forces them to revisit the issue. i would have done the same

  1. I don’t think it’s true dfinity went silent, see this twitter thread for more info

After establishing the social graph of 5 persons and 6 email addresses (they really need to go Web3), it appears that an ex-employee of the proposer may have run away with the wallet 9926. The proposer was led by this ex-employee into believing that her wallet 7110 has been updated as she expected, while in fact it never happened. From DFINITY’s end, the wallet has always been 9926 under the name of this investor from the beginning based on its KYC record. This ex-employee is believed to be the one who controls 9926. He left the proposer’s company in late 2021 and has since then cut off contact with everyone.

  1. The proposal was spectacularly rejected. Does that mean dfinity should’ve just ignored it?

The NNS is just the wrong place for things like this.