I assume you are referring to this thread linked below regarding the FomoWell SNS and written by @4eku. That thread is a great example of an intellectually honest, diplomatic, and fair investigation report. It was fact based, not ad hominem and not defamatory. In my opinion, it achieved exactly the kind of interaction on the forum that we should be seeking. Every single person associated with that SNS seems to have come forward with a statement regarding their role and opinion on the situation. I believe that happened because the evidence was presented in a neutral tone and spoke for itself. It didn’t need any embellishment from the critics.
Sure, there are quite a few degens who still feel the need to turn that thread into a swamp. I don’t know if Adam had a role in that investigation behind the scenes, but his comments in the forum thread certainly don’t seem to add any intellectual value to the discussion up to this point. However, he is seen as a leader in the ICP ecosystem and people clearly take their cues from him. I would hope that someone of his power and influence would try to be more professional. That’s all that is asked when we engage on the forum. It’s not hard to be civilized and professional. There are so many examples where it has been done effectively including this one. I don’t think it’s too much to ask.