Boom DAO minting proposal 653

[borovan]

Are you the fool on the stage preaching to the three people left in the audience? How much did Wenzel pay you from the WTN treasury again?

[Mico]

Wenzel paid me nothing. I earned a grant for my active participation in a dao. Again this is not the topic of this thread.

[esquivada]

He sold his last 18 million boom, and minted 250M, enjoying his exacerbated maturity by plundering investors. That’s stealing and scamming. I personally invested 2000 ICP in the SNS sale and I have not sold a single neuron because I trusted that Adam would do something good with this DAO, but Max’s predator arrived to plunder once again but now without any shame

[Mico]

They sold 18 million boom from a treasury transfer proposal. Yes I agree that is stealing and scamming.

They stole money from the treasury and screwed over retail I fully agree with that.

[Mico]

I have been here since 2024 adam. I have not lied once I have provided evidence for all I speak on.

[Mico]

Thats not true at all.

The grant was announce prior to the sns sale #2 for wtn. It was not new and it had nothing to do with me talking on the forums.

WaterNeuron - What's next + SNS #2?

WaterNeuron DAO launched on July 3rd, 2024, and has rapidly emerged as a key player in ICP staking. In five months we reached 1.3M ICP staked in the protocol. We propose to the community a summary of what WaterNeuron protocol has achieved since launch, a second SNS, and give grants to the contributors. The overarching goal is to decentralize further a protocol that has a larger voice in the NNS. Summary WaterNeuron Protocol 5 months At launch, WaterNeuron deployed open-sourced and audited code…

Grants were announced on December 3rd 2024. Well before adam went on this initiative.

[Mico]

Ive asked you for evidence on your claims since day 1. So far you choose to hide it all and act on conspiracy. I have told you that if you provide me with the data to see for myself I would fully support you. I don’t take you at your word like everyone else does and I am not sure why that is being demonized.

[esquivada]

I’m not a technician, but there would be no way to vote in the NNS as a superior body to take control of BOOMDAO, burn those 250M, and return the dao to its members. Then finally turn it into MIMIC

[WebTreeSoftwareSolut]

@WebTreeSoftwareSolut

Do you realize you got a grant for distracting Adam on here so that he would be less effective and focused on his 3 week long cyber battle he just fought right?

ok im sorry you’re right. im a bit angry

[volibear]

Mico, you are kind of derailing the discussions with your irrelevant and unproductive and repetitive posts

[Mico]

Thank you, I didn’t think you would intentionally diminish my grant to this. I know tensions are high right now but I am doing my best to source the truth through data and facts.

[Mico]

I posted this then everyone attacked me with off topic conversations. Please direct the same post to those moving the conversation away from the boom dao topic.

Boom DAO minting proposal 653

The motion proposal stated that the newly minted tokens were dumped on icpswap which is incorrect. They staked all new tokens. The only tokens they did sell were from a treasury transfer and not newly minted tokens. [image] [image] And tokens sent to a canister still hold the 1 million tokens from this mint event. [image] Other than that I wonder why dfinity voted to reject this as well as CO.Delta and D-Quorum. (Im not asking about code gov as adam has stated his theory for it.)

[Mico]

Very interesting cat. Thank you for the kind words. Again here is my contribution to the conversation prior to you and adam going at my throat with off topic conversations.

Boom DAO minting proposal 653

The motion proposal stated that the newly minted tokens were dumped on icpswap which is incorrect. They staked all new tokens. The only tokens they did sell were from a treasury transfer and not newly minted tokens. [image] [image] And tokens sent to a canister still hold the 1 million tokens from this mint event. [image] Other than that I wonder why dfinity voted to reject this as well as CO.Delta and D-Quorum. (Im not asking about code gov as adam has stated his theory for it.)

[Mico]

You may remove yourself if you don’t want to talk to me. Here you go again. Feel free to read what I said or to stop replying to me yourself. Thank you again.

Boom DAO minting proposal 653

The motion proposal stated that the newly minted tokens were dumped on icpswap which is incorrect. They staked all new tokens. The only tokens they did sell were from a treasury transfer and not newly minted tokens. [image] [image] And tokens sent to a canister still hold the 1 million tokens from this mint event. [image] Other than that I wonder why dfinity voted to reject this as well as CO.Delta and D-Quorum. (Im not asking about code gov as adam has stated his theory for it.)

[Mico]

Hey, you seem to be trying to move the conversation to a different topic. Please either create a new thread or move back on topic. Thank you.

[Mico]

Here you go. A quick reminder of what this is about. Boom DAO minting proposal 653 - #17 by Mico

[WebTreeSoftwareSolut]

Mico no one cares.

It doesnt matter what they did with the tokens, in the original post I made I said they did it to make it impossible to takeover (implying they plan to stake them.)

These guys repeatedly ripped off their investors and you’re on here spouting nonsense.

If these guys commited murder you’d be on here telling us "well they didn’t torture anyone. It was quick and painless."

[Mico]

Thank you cat. Your voice matters too. Ill continue to post but please remove the personal attacks and stay on topic.

[volibear]

@WebTreeSoftwareSolut

These guys repeatedly ripped off their investors and you’re on here spouting nonsense.

more like he’s defending him purposefully

[Mico]

I guess the facts do not matter. It is important to understand what happened so it can be better prevented in the future.

Again I have never said anything to justify their actions nor did I ever agree with these actions they took. Accuracy matters for determining the fix for the problems at hand.