API Boundary Node Management

Proposal #135593 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted
Reason:
The proposal removes healthy Active status API Boundary node cjdpl from the AW1 DC in Pennsylvania part of US East region, from NP Bigger Capital that needs to be redeployed as part of the post-48-month transition requirements that can be found here.

Proposal #135594

Vote: Adopted
Reason:
The proposal adds unassigned healthy Awaiting status node gvqb5 from the TO1 DC in Toronto part of US East region, from NP 0X52 that will replace the previously removed API Boundary node cjdpl.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

1 Like

Proposal Update — Wenzel | CodeGov

Topic: API Boundary Node Management

Proposal: 135593
Vote: ADOPT
Title: Remove 1 API boundary node(s)

Proposal: 135594
Vote: ADOPT
Title: Add 1 API boundary node(s)

Comments: These proposals were adopted by the CodeGov known neuron at the recommendation of one of our CodeGov team members, @ZackDS, after he reviewed the proposal and posted his review here.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

1 Like

We have just submitted another two proposals to replace a dead API boundary node:

  • Proposal #136565 removes API BN tcln7, which is down due to a failed disk.
  • Proposal #136566 turns node jlifv into an API BN to replace tcln7. The node has both an IPv4 address, as well as a correctly configured domain name and can therefore be used as API BN.

Have a great weekend and happy voting!

2 Likes

Proposals 136565 & 136566 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

These two proposals replace API boundary node tcln7, appearing as “Offline” in the IC dashboard, with node jlifv, which appears in the dashboard as “Awaiting”.

  • Both nodes are from South Africa, so the geographical distribution of API boundary nodes is essentially unchanged.
  • The node provider and data centre owner for the replacement node are not already represented in the current API boundary nodes.
  • Using the ic-admin tool it can be seen that the replacement node has an IPv4 address and a domain name.
About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons’ Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

2 Likes

Proposals 136565 & 136566 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The first proposal removes dead API Boundary Node tcln7, Dashboard Status: Offline in order for this to be replaced in the next proposal.

The second proposal adds API Boundary Node jlifv, Dashboard Status: Awaiting.

Both Node Machines are in the Region: Africa,ZA,Gauteng, meaning that global distribution remains unchanged.

The added node has a domain name and an IPv4 address as verified with the ic-admin tool

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

2 Likes

Proposal 136565 & 136566 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Adds healthy boundary node which replaces dead boundary node in same region.

  • Proposed to add and remove 1 boundary node
  • IP V4 is assigned public_ipv4_config: Some("ip_addr 102.221.177.171 gw [\n \"102.221.177.169\",\n] prefix_length 24") :white_check_mark:
  • Domain name assigned :white_check_mark:
Changes
  • jlifv-mddo3-zfwdc-x2wmu-xklbj-dai3i-3pvjy-j4hqm-sarqr-fhkq6-zae - Africa,ZA,Gauteng
  • tcln7-paoz5-dzngx-cv5ih-rqi35-6dhhd-5j26y-mnu43-xbguo-vgp7h-yqe - Africa,ZA,Gauteng
Boundary nodes stats
  • 20 nodes
  • Same data centers: Orlando (2) :warning:
  • Same node providers:
    • Giant Leaf (3 nodes) :warning:
    • OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital (2 nodes) :warning:

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.

  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.

  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

3 Likes

Proposal 136565 & 136566 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES :white_check_mark:

TLDR:
This proposal pair removes 1 offline API boundary node(s) from Gauteng 1 and adds 1 healthy replacement node(s) in Gauteng 3.

All nodes are in the correct state for their respective actions. I vote to adopt.

Provider Changes
Removed Added
Karel Frank Wolkboer (Pty) Ltd
Location Changes
Removed Added
, jb1 , jb3
Node Changes

Removed Nodes (1)

Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
tcln7… DOWN Karel Frank jb1 Gauteng 1

Added Nodes (1)

Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
jlifv… UNASSIGNED Wolkboer (Pty) Ltd jb3 Gauteng 3

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: Node tcln7…: Down status check passed.

:white_check_mark: Node jlifv…: Status check passed (UNASSIGNED).

:white_check_mark: Node jlifv…: IP Address assigned.

:white_check_mark: Node jlifv…: Domain Checked.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

3 Likes

Proposal 136565 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Removes 1 offline API Boundary Node which is replaced by a separate open proposal, a review for which will be posted shortly. See combined outcome analysis in the following posts.

Map Description
  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

  • Green marker represents an added node

  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node

  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the API boundary nodes (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

  • Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes
Action Node Status IPv4 Domain Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove tcln7 DOWN 41.198.146.21 node1.jb1.lerak.email Africa South Africa Gauteng 1 (jb1) Teraco Karel Frank 2rzvs
Other API Boundary Nodes
Node Status IPv4 Domain Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
ubipk UP 213.246.205.106 br1-dll01.aviatelabs.co Europe Belgium Brussels (br1) Digital Realty Allusion mjeqs
gvqb5 UP 208.185.131.132 to1-dll01.blockchaindevelopmentlabs.com North America Canada Toronto (to1) Cyxtera 0X52 wrg4t
5dpkp UP 208.184.66.5 bc1-dll02.blockchaindevlabs.com North America Canada Vancouver (bc1) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs feb2q
4fssn UP 83.137.84.35 node2.ge2.extragone.com Europe Switzerland Geneva 2 (ge2) SafeHost Extragone SA 5atxd
dl74z UP 5.148.170.227 zh3-dll02.tenderloin.ch Europe Switzerland Zurich 3 (zh3) Nine.Ch Tomahawk.vc anodw
ec62l UP 194.191.27.164 dll01-zh6.sygnum.com Europe Switzerland Zurich 6 (zh6) Green.ch Sygnum Bank ciprs
lwxeh UP 62.209.62.115 node2.fr2.virtualhive.org Europe Germany Frankfurt 2 (fr2) Equinix Virtual Hive Ltd 3nu7r
4p3lu UP 103.104.75.148 node1.nd1.zenithcode.dev Asia India New Delhi 1 (nd1) Marvelous Web3 DC Zenith Code LLC ihcmc
bfj6y UP 103.19.137.138 node1.krishnaaenterprises.co.in Asia India Panvel 2 (pl2) Yotta Krishna Enterprises 7rw6b
coqzx UP 154.193.67.25 kr2-icp-node1.web3gameicp.top Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 2 (kr2) Gasan Web3game 5dwhe
q6hk7 UP 89.46.103.130 bu1-dll01.baba.dev Europe Romania Bucharest (bu1) M247 Iancu Aurel c5ssg
mbsyf UP 45.125.21.34 dll01.sg1.icp.162.technology Asia Singapore Singapore (sg1) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital d4bin
pxxcj UP 103.22.169.68 dll02.sg2.icp.162.technology Asia Singapore Singapore 2 (sg2) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital qffmn
ek6px UP 66.35.86.130 at2-dll01.gntlficpnode.com North America United States of America (the) Atlanta 2 (at2) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC spsu4
yqbqe UP 74.81.93.59 hu1-dll02.hu1.43rdbigideafilms.com North America United States of America (the) Houston (hu1) TRG 43rd Big Idea Films fthz3
bcbz4 UP 148.66.246.5 lv1-dll03.eightysevenm.io North America United States of America (the) Las Vegas (lv1) Flexential 87m Neuron, LLC gsps3
atrq6 UP 66.35.76.227 or1-dll02.gntlficpnode.com North America United States of America (the) Orlando (or1) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC 2rqo7
mj4qw UP 66.35.76.226 or1-dll01.gntlficpnode.com North America United States of America (the) Orlando (or1) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC 2rqo7
upg5h UP 64.124.79.194 node01.sj2.omnistake.com North America United States of America (the) San Jose (sj2) Digital Realty BlockTech Ventures, LLC eikix

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.


Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

Proposal 136566 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: This proposal adds a new API boundary node, given the removal of an offline one by proposal 136565. See combined outcome analysis in the following post.

IPv4 + Domain confirmed →

dig +short node2.jb3.wolkboer.co.za A
102.221.177.171

@rbirkner I noted that the node being added is on a different replica version to the other API boundary nodes. Not really an issue, as replica deployments to boundary nodes are staggered anyway (but may be worth upgrading it shortly after this proposal for consistency).

Map Description
  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

  • Green marker represents an added node

  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node

  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the API boundary nodes (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

  • Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes
Action Node Status IPv4 Domain Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Add jlifv UNASSIGNED 102.221.177.171 node2.jb3.wolkboer.co.za Africa South Africa Gauteng 3 (jb3) Xneelo Wolkboer (Pty) Ltd ymenq
Other API Boundary Nodes
Node Status IPv4 Domain Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
ubipk UP 213.246.205.106 br1-dll01.aviatelabs.co Europe Belgium Brussels (br1) Digital Realty Allusion mjeqs
gvqb5 UP 208.185.131.132 to1-dll01.blockchaindevelopmentlabs.com North America Canada Toronto (to1) Cyxtera 0X52 wrg4t
5dpkp UP 208.184.66.5 bc1-dll02.blockchaindevlabs.com North America Canada Vancouver (bc1) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs feb2q
4fssn UP 83.137.84.35 node2.ge2.extragone.com Europe Switzerland Geneva 2 (ge2) SafeHost Extragone SA 5atxd
dl74z UP 5.148.170.227 zh3-dll02.tenderloin.ch Europe Switzerland Zurich 3 (zh3) Nine.Ch Tomahawk.vc anodw
ec62l UP 194.191.27.164 dll01-zh6.sygnum.com Europe Switzerland Zurich 6 (zh6) Green.ch Sygnum Bank ciprs
lwxeh UP 62.209.62.115 node2.fr2.virtualhive.org Europe Germany Frankfurt 2 (fr2) Equinix Virtual Hive Ltd 3nu7r
4p3lu UP 103.104.75.148 node1.nd1.zenithcode.dev Asia India New Delhi 1 (nd1) Marvelous Web3 DC Zenith Code LLC ihcmc
bfj6y UP 103.19.137.138 node1.krishnaaenterprises.co.in Asia India Panvel 2 (pl2) Yotta Krishna Enterprises 7rw6b
coqzx UP 154.193.67.25 kr2-icp-node1.web3gameicp.top Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 2 (kr2) Gasan Web3game 5dwhe
q6hk7 UP 89.46.103.130 bu1-dll01.baba.dev Europe Romania Bucharest (bu1) M247 Iancu Aurel c5ssg
mbsyf UP 45.125.21.34 dll01.sg1.icp.162.technology Asia Singapore Singapore (sg1) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital d4bin
pxxcj UP 103.22.169.68 dll02.sg2.icp.162.technology Asia Singapore Singapore 2 (sg2) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital qffmn
ek6px UP 66.35.86.130 at2-dll01.gntlficpnode.com North America United States of America (the) Atlanta 2 (at2) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC spsu4
yqbqe UP 74.81.93.59 hu1-dll02.hu1.43rdbigideafilms.com North America United States of America (the) Houston (hu1) TRG 43rd Big Idea Films fthz3
bcbz4 UP 148.66.246.5 lv1-dll03.eightysevenm.io North America United States of America (the) Las Vegas (lv1) Flexential 87m Neuron, LLC gsps3
atrq6 UP 66.35.76.227 or1-dll02.gntlficpnode.com North America United States of America (the) Orlando (or1) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC 2rqo7
mj4qw UP 66.35.76.226 or1-dll01.gntlficpnode.com North America United States of America (the) Orlando (or1) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC 2rqo7
upg5h UP 64.124.79.194 node01.sj2.omnistake.com North America United States of America (the) San Jose (sj2) Digital Realty BlockTech Ventures, LLC eikix
tcln7 DOWN 41.198.146.21 node1.jb1.lerak.email Africa South Africa Gauteng 1 (jb1) Teraco Karel Frank 2rzvs

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.


Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

This review looks at the combined effect of both proposals described above. Though they’re not executed atomically, they both relate to one another in that they take the API boundary nodes to a new topology configuration. →

Proposal 136565, 136566 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: LGTM, the geographics distribution of API boundary nodes is unaffected by these two proposals if they’re both executed successfully.

I note however that there are numerous replica nodes on other continents where there are currently no API boundary nodes. My analysis indicated that there are no suitable nodes nearby for becoming API boundary nodes (hence why they don’t show up on the map below as yellow dots). This means it’s not currently possible to satisfy these criteria →

But I gather that this is a work in progress, and I’m looking forward to seeing this evolve over time towards the desired state.

Decentralisation Stats

API Boundary Node distance stats (distance between any 2 API Boundary Nodes) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
EXISTING 0 km 7919.197 km 16960.232 km
PROPOSED 0 km 7917.628 km 16943.318 km (-0.1%)

API Boundary Node characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
EXISTING 4 10 19 15 17 19
PROPOSED 4 10 19 15 17 19

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
EXISTING 8 6 2 3 3 2
PROPOSED 8 6 2 3 3 2

@rbirkner, is there anything similar to the IC Target Topology, but for API boundary nodes as opposed to subnets? e.g. something like Motion 135700

Map Description
  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

  • Green marker represents an added node

  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node

  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the API boundary nodes (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

  • Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes
Action Node Status IPv4 Domain Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove tcln7 DOWN 41.198.146.21 node1.jb1.lerak.email Africa South Africa Gauteng 1 (jb1) Teraco Karel Frank 2rzvs
Add jlifv UNASSIGNED 102.221.177.171 node2.jb3.wolkboer.co.za Africa South Africa Gauteng 3 (jb3) Xneelo Wolkboer (Pty) Ltd ymenq
Other API Boundary Nodes
Node Status IPv4 Domain Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
ubipk UP 213.246.205.106 br1-dll01.aviatelabs.co Europe Belgium Brussels (br1) Digital Realty Allusion mjeqs
gvqb5 UP 208.185.131.132 to1-dll01.blockchaindevelopmentlabs.com North America Canada Toronto (to1) Cyxtera 0X52 wrg4t
5dpkp UP 208.184.66.5 bc1-dll02.blockchaindevlabs.com North America Canada Vancouver (bc1) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs feb2q
4fssn UP 83.137.84.35 node2.ge2.extragone.com Europe Switzerland Geneva 2 (ge2) SafeHost Extragone SA 5atxd
dl74z UP 5.148.170.227 zh3-dll02.tenderloin.ch Europe Switzerland Zurich 3 (zh3) Nine.Ch Tomahawk.vc anodw
ec62l UP 194.191.27.164 dll01-zh6.sygnum.com Europe Switzerland Zurich 6 (zh6) Green.ch Sygnum Bank ciprs
lwxeh UP 62.209.62.115 node2.fr2.virtualhive.org Europe Germany Frankfurt 2 (fr2) Equinix Virtual Hive Ltd 3nu7r
4p3lu UP 103.104.75.148 node1.nd1.zenithcode.dev Asia India New Delhi 1 (nd1) Marvelous Web3 DC Zenith Code LLC ihcmc
bfj6y UP 103.19.137.138 node1.krishnaaenterprises.co.in Asia India Panvel 2 (pl2) Yotta Krishna Enterprises 7rw6b
coqzx UP 154.193.67.25 kr2-icp-node1.web3gameicp.top Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 2 (kr2) Gasan Web3game 5dwhe
q6hk7 UP 89.46.103.130 bu1-dll01.baba.dev Europe Romania Bucharest (bu1) M247 Iancu Aurel c5ssg
mbsyf UP 45.125.21.34 dll01.sg1.icp.162.technology Asia Singapore Singapore (sg1) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital d4bin
pxxcj UP 103.22.169.68 dll02.sg2.icp.162.technology Asia Singapore Singapore 2 (sg2) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital qffmn
ek6px UP 66.35.86.130 at2-dll01.gntlficpnode.com North America United States of America (the) Atlanta 2 (at2) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC spsu4
yqbqe UP 74.81.93.59 hu1-dll02.hu1.43rdbigideafilms.com North America United States of America (the) Houston (hu1) TRG 43rd Big Idea Films fthz3
bcbz4 UP 148.66.246.5 lv1-dll03.eightysevenm.io North America United States of America (the) Las Vegas (lv1) Flexential 87m Neuron, LLC gsps3
atrq6 UP 66.35.76.227 or1-dll02.gntlficpnode.com North America United States of America (the) Orlando (or1) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC 2rqo7
mj4qw UP 66.35.76.226 or1-dll01.gntlficpnode.com North America United States of America (the) Orlando (or1) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC 2rqo7
upg5h UP 64.124.79.194 node01.sj2.omnistake.com North America United States of America (the) San Jose (sj2) Digital Realty BlockTech Ventures, LLC eikix

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.


Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

2 Likes

Proposal #136565 & 136566 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted

Reason:
The proposal replaces dead Offline status API Boundary Node tcln7 from Guateng, South Africa with unassigned healthy Awaiting status node jlifv from same location, different DC without any change to decentralization. The new node has ipV4 address set 102.221.177.171 and an associated domain name node2.jb3.wolkboer.co.za.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

1 Like