The team said it is very often requested, but they have more important stuff to work on. I’ll try to get someone with a better grasp of their plans to respond…
Thank you, I just know that it’s a real blocker (for II usage) for several folks.
Plus, other than the nick memorization advantage, Web3 shouldn’t be a world where are people treated like a number - that should be just a unique index which is linked to some username.
Thanks for reaching out, I’ll try to shed some light.
as @Severin mentioned, that is something that is often requested but which we couldn’t implement easily due to technical reasons (in particular, how II lays out its data in the canister stable memory) and due to other priorities (we tried to focus on cleaning up the design and improving onboarding).
That being said, @bartosz is currently working on improving the data layout, which once completed will make this much simpler to implement! So this should hopefully become a thing in the next quarter or so.
Thanks for checking in on this. We’ve been pretty busy with other features (related to attribute sharing) but yes, there was progress! @bartosz did complete the foundation work to make this possible.
This is feedback we regularly get; as soon as this new attribute sharing feature is shipped we’ll start looking into how we can make this happen!