Hi everyone,
I am not confident.
The following is implemented through BLS threshold signatures:
- signature of certified state (2/3 or more?)
- signature of catch-up package(CUP)(2/3 or more?)
- signature of random beacon (1/3 or more?)
- signature of random tape (1/3 or more?)
The following is implemented through aggregation of BLS signatures:
- aggregating multiple notarization shares into a single signature notarization (2/3 or more?)
- aggregating multiple finalization shares into a single signature finalization (2/3 or more?)
signature of certified state
On the whitepaper, it is written as (n - f)-out-of-n. Does this actually mean 2/3 or more?
catch-up package (CUP)
On the whitepaper, it is written as (n - f)-out-of-n. Does this actually mean 2/3 or more?
signature of random beacon
On the whitepaper, it is written as (f + 1)-out-of-n. Does this actually mean 1/3 or more?
signature of random tape
On the whitepaper, it is written as (f + 1)-out-of-n. Does this actually mean 1/3 or more?
aggregating multiple notarization shares into a single signature notarization
On the whitepaper, it is written as n-f. Does this actually mean 2/3 or more?
aggregating multiple finalization shares into a single signature finalization
On the whitepaper, it is written as n-f. Does this actually mean 2/3 or more?