That sounds like a great idea to me. Thanks @infu
You could apply that reasoning to any SNS launch. This has been the mentality applied by many on previous SNSs, and I think there’s plenty of evidence to suggest that by and large this doesn’t produce desirable results. In numerous cases quite the opposite.
The reason that SNSs have to pass an initial launch proposal is precisely to check that the project meets a certain standard and some basic criteria.
There’s no incentive for this to happen while the devs still have a treasury they can draw from. All the while those who invested will no doubt feel very bitter about this.
Who’s going to audit how those funds are spent. Many of the tools and utilities mentioned are offchain. Therefore they’re not owned by the DAO. How much of the funds raised will go towards building these sorts of things? Whatever the commitment is, who’s going to check that this is the case?
A reason for investors to invest (and also to participate in governance) should already be established, or the project is too early for an SNS launch. That’s the way I see it, and that’s the way I’ll vote.
Why not take a look at working on @infu’s suggestion first.