Thoughts on the token standard

Developers
33

Continuing the discussion from Thoughts on the token standard:

@Hazel @stephenandrews @senior.joinu @geokos @hackape @harrison @ICVF

What do you think of having conversations on standards and improvement proposals take place on OpenCan?

Reason I make the suggestion is because:

  1. We need to start diluting the power of today’s two main neurons
  2. We need a long-term solution for where conversations about standards and improvement proposals take place (unity in collaboration will yield the best options)
  3. To be most efficient in regards to taking action on those conversations, we need a process for making proposals to the NNS (decentralized governance will help solve #1 and will yield the fastest innovation)

The current idea is to make OpenCan a developer-governed neuron for collaboration on improvement proposals and standards that, once approved within the dapp, get submitted for final voting to the NNS. As this would be its own neuron, it’s one we could delegate voting power to and therefore start diluting the power of today’s two main neurons.

There are already a couple threads on this token standard, but it will need adoption to work. What do you think of this idea?

2 Likes