What happened to the established workflow, proposer 61?
Proposal: 133320 - ICP Dashboard (internetcomputer.org)
The above proposal doesn’t contain a reference to a forum post where voters can go see critical discussion about the proposal (to inform their vote, or share their insight). There was no forum post to reference, because the proposal wasn’t announced. I don’t think proposals like this are conducive to effective decentralisation, and responsible voting behaviour, so I’ll be rejecting this proposal. I’d be happy to adopt a replacement proposal that follows established procedure.
Proposal 133320
2 removed down/degraded nodes replaced with unassigned node in the US and Switzerland.
Decentralisation Stats
Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →
| Smallest Distance | Average Distance | Largest Distance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXISTING | 317.676 km | 8678.125 km | 18505.029 km |
| PROPOSED | 300.075 km (-5.5%) | 8719.449 km (+0.5%) | 18505.029 km |
Subnet characteristic counts →
| Continents | Countries | Data Centers | Owners | Node Providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXISTING | 5 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 |
| PROPOSED | 5 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 |
Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →
| Continent | Country | Data Center | Owner | Node Provider | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXISTING | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| PROPOSED | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
See here for acceptable limits → Motion 132136
The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:
Map Description
- Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)
- Green marker represents an added node
- Blue marker represents an unchanged node
- Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)
- Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)
Table
Known Neurons to follow if you're too busy to keep on top of things like this
If you found this analysis helpful and would like to follow the vote of the LORIMER known neuron in the future, consider configuring LORIMER as a followee for the Subnet Management topic.
Other good neurons to follow:
-
Synapse (follows the LORIMER and CodeGov known neurons for Subnet Management, and is a generally well informed known neuron to follow on numerous other topics)
-
CodeGov (actively reviews and votes on Subnet Management proposals, and is well informed on numerous other technical topics)
-
WaterNeuron (the WaterNeuron DAO frequently discuss proposals like this in order to vote responsibly based on DAO consensus)