Just to clarify this point: the explore
functionality requires network access to the nodes, but the verify CUP
functionality does not require that. The authenticity of the CUP can be verified using the root key of the Internet Computer.
Thanks for the heads up Tim, this is great news!
August: Summary at 2025-08-15 14:23 UTC
See this post and following discussion for context.
Degraded or Down Nodes
- 2fq7c: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- 3hhby: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- 4zbus: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- 5kdm2: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- k44fs: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- pjljw: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- pzp6e: 1 (11 more would stall the subnet)
- rtvil: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
- shefu: 2 (3 more would stall the subnet)
- w4asl: 1 (4 more would stall the subnet)
Summary Grouped by Node Provider
- Wancloud limited: 8 out of 9 assigned nodes are degraded or offline (88.9%)
- 2a7fq-jivc5-upcob-l5e6k-v3l6a-xo4fc-5rfga-7t5ng-cnv72-t6z7d-wqe DOWN
- 2w5be-ukk5g-kmecu-jxtan-w2gsb-htdfz-z5czd-6yacq-cemqu-qhjpm-iqe DOWN
- bqplp-iejs2-2awcz-oiy6u-62jzx-rzp66-z4eba-m6nan-dtljh-bb4pn-rae DOWN
- fpjx3-tfebc-csio2-hxi4u-7jomj-p4c4q-b66xe-ngut6-yi63x-keuhl-6ae DOWN
- gsvxv-tou7p-drlxw-rnldp-m7z3n-e42j4-nrsp4-dzsfc-7wuqr-2qwpf-pae DOWN
- jemyk-uhint-w6ftv-s3xpy-ne4hr-xbcpu-aqskm-6a4cy-orm5q-aqqwd-gqe DOWN
- ked4e-syml2-ao2ub-xgtxi-awdfd-2vkf6-lbol5-prycv-2vpb5-ws5jp-oae DOWN
- q6i2a-r2jyo-qvchx-fx2eg-5vz74-tb674-au7zd-cy24h-wvywl-zbyro-7ae DOWN
- 2a7fq-jivc5-upcob-l5e6k-v3l6a-xo4fc-5rfga-7t5ng-cnv72-t6z7d-wqe DOWN
- Power Meta Corporation: 1 out of 3 assigned nodes are degraded or offline (33.3%)
- Pindar Technology Limited: 2 out of 29 assigned nodes are degraded or offline (6.9%)
Online/Offline (Up/Down) & Assigned/Unassigned Analysis
Unassigned nodes up < Assigned nodes up
The below is a list of node providers who have fewer unassigned nodes online than they have assigned nodes online (ignoring node providers who have 0 unassigned nodes). Assuming this snapshot is representative, their rewards will overestimate their contribution to resource availability (due to extrapolation described by motion 135054).
Node Provider | Assigned | Unassigned | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Power Meta Corporation | 3 67% are up | 2 0% are up | 5 40% are up |
Bitmoon | 2 100% are up | 1 0% are up | 3 67% are up |
Privoxy Solutions, LLC | 1 100% are up | 2 50% are up | 3 67% are up |
Anonstake | 14 100% are up | 2 50% are up | 16 94% are up |
Icaria Systems Pty Ltd | 17 100% are up | 1 0% are up | 18 94% are up |
Karel Frank | 12 100% are up | 7 86% are up | 19 95% are up |
Starbase | 24 100% are up | 18 89% are up | 42 95% are up |
BlockTech Ventures, LLC | 1 100% are up | 26 96% are up | 27 96% are up |
Uvaca Labs LLC | 1 100% are up | 27 96% are up | 28 96% are up |
DFINITY Stiftung | 49 100% are up | 22 91% are up | 71 97% are up |
Giant Leaf, LLC | 10 100% are up | 29 97% are up | 39 97% are up |
Zarety LLC | 10 100% are up | 32 97% are up | 42 98% are up |
Unassigned nodes up > Assigned nodes up
The below is a list of node providers who have more unassigned nodes online than they have assigned nodes online (including node providers who have 0 assigned nodes). Assuming this snapshot is representative, their rewards will underestimate their contribution to resource availability (due to extrapolation described by motion 135054).
Node Provider | Assigned | Unassigned | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Wancloud limited | 9 11% are up | 1 100% are up | 10 20% are up |
InfoObjects | 0 0% are up | 4 50% are up | 4 50% are up |
Zondax AG | 0 0% are up | 2 50% are up | 2 50% are up |
Pindar Technology Limited | 29 93% are up | 7 100% are up | 36 94% are up |
ANTHONY ISAAKIDIS | 0 0% are up | 28 100% are up | 28 100% are up |
Reist Telecom AG | 0 0% are up | 28 100% are up | 28 100% are up |
NoviSystems, LLC | 0 0% are up | 3 100% are up | 3 100% are up |
This is what you are âcalling DOWNâ and linking to:
How should someone who doesnât know how to check trust you ?
Hello @ZackDS, what happened to your old account?
The node is currently offline (âdownâ as opposed to âupâ). Today is the 31st of July. Your screenshot is out-of-date.
Unfortunately that dashboard has been lagging behind recently. Thatâs why thereâs also a link to the dashboard that displays the current status (rather than just the history). Hereâs a screenshot in case it helps.
Actually it is your link in the post, maybe get your facts straight before engaging and deflecting.
Maybe go ahead and update your scripts, just posting random stuff makes you look desperate for attention
Thank you for your feedback