Subnet Management - ejbmu (Application)

Proposal 135429 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces unhealthy node.

  • Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient stayed the same as on current topology.
Node Changes 1 removed, 1 added
Node ID Status Country City Node Provider Data Center Data Center Owner
kv4yb-otkiz-ilqle-wk3b3-upqjh-hvkhv-wmbqq-ca4qq-5va4r-matmt-oqe55nob-iffps-r2vwq-gjrc6-owksr-2j4mq-rwcup-qbcr2-iomah-7pych-rae DOWN → UNASSIGNED USUS FloridaTexas Rivonia Holdings LLC87m Neuron, LLC jv1dl1 TierpointFlexential
Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 1 2 13
City 5 1 1 13
Data Center 5 1 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 1 13
Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 1 2 13
City 5 1 1 13
Data Center 5 1 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 1 13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

1 Like

Proposal 135429 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: Yes :white_check_mark:

TLDR:
The proposal replaces offline nodes in Jacksonville (North America). The decentralization stats remain the same.

:warning: Warning

The last few proposals that address the outage of DC is offloading all nodes to one Node provider. @DRE-Team @sat, is this a bug on the DRE tool, it seems to be offloading to one centralized location.

Provider Changes
Removed Added
Rivonia Holdings LLC 87m Neuron, LLC
Location Changes
Removed Added
North America, Jacksonville North America, Dallas
Nodes Removed 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
kv4yb… DOWN Rivonia Holdings LLC jv1 Jacksonville
Nodes Added 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
55nob… UNASSIGNED 87m Neuron, LLC dl1 Dallas

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: Node kv4yb…: Health check passed.

:white_check_mark: Node kv4yb…: Remove from Subnet check passed.

:white_check_mark: Node 55nob…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

1 Like

Proposal #135429 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted
Reason:
The proposal replaces dead Offline status node kv4yb from the JV1 DC in Florida, with unassigned healthy Awaiting status node 55nob from Dallas without any change to decentralization.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

Proposal 135429 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal replaces a dead nodes on subnet ejbmu:
dead node kv4yb Dashboard Status: Offline with node 55nob Dashboard Status: Awaiting

There is no impact in the overall decentralization across all features.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.