Subnet Management - cv73p (Application)

Proposal 134976 Review | LORIMER Known Neuron

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Decentralisation stats are slightly improved (see Decentralisation Stats below) and there is a clear public declaration for the cordoned node which is referred to in the proposal summary. 1 cordoned node in Europe replaced with an unassigned node in Asia.

Country Discrepancies (2)
Node Data Center Claimed Country According to api.ip2location.io According to ip-api.com According to domain WHOIS lookup
hgvcj Geneva 2 Switzerland Germany Switzerland Germany
qtcl6 Seoul 3 Korea (the Republic of) Belgium China China

See here for related discussion

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
EXISTING 104.032 km 6044.448 km 16654.257 km
PROPOSED 224.918 km (+116.2%) 6586.338 km (+9%) 16654.257 km

This proposal slightly increases decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical increase in localised disaster resilience). :+1:

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
EXISTING 3 10 13 13 13 13
PROPOSED 3 11 (+9.1%) 13 13 13 13

This proposal slightly improves decentralisation in terms of jurisdiction diversity. :+1:

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
EXISTING 8 2 1 1 1 1
PROPOSED 7 (-12.5%) 2 1 1 1 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 132136

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description
  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

  • Green marker represents an added node

  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node

  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

  • Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to api.ip2location.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove njsmq UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Maribor (mb1) Posita.si Fractal Labs AG 3xiew
Add qtcl6 UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 3 (kr1) KT Pindar Technology Limited iubpe
Other Nodes
Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
ek3yy UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Brussels (br1) Digital Realty Allusion mjeqs
hgvcj UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Geneva 2 (ge2) SafeHost Archery Blockchain SCSp 5atxd
lkrgq UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Zurich 2 (zh2) Everyware DFINITY Stiftung wqyl3
2mmpk UP :bar_chart: Europe Spain Madrid 3 (ma3) IPCore Maksym Ishchenko wtsc7
jemyk UP :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 1 (hk1) Unicom Wancloud limited z6cfb
tfw5b UP :bar_chart: Asia Japan Tokyo (ty1) Equinix Starbase cqjev
ax6zb UP :bar_chart: Europe Lithuania Vilnius 1 (bt1) Baltneta Ivanov Oleksandr y3du2
wihnn UP :bar_chart: Europe Romania Bucharest (bu1) M247 Iancu Aurel c5ssg
3fgii UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore (sg1) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital d4bin
dnorv UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Ljubljana 2 (lj2) Anonstake Anonstake eu5wc
eu2gw UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Allentown (aw1) Tierpoint Bigger Capital codio
i7u4k UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Orlando (or1) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC redpf

*This comment references the latest comment in the Subnet Management - General Discussion thread only to generate an automated cross-link from the general thread (to improve topic navigation).


You may wish to follow D-QUORUM if you found this analysis helpful.

Known Neurons to follow if you're too busy to keep on top of things like this

If you found this analysis helpful and would like to follow the vote of the LORIMER known neuron in the future, consider configuring LORIMER as a followee for the Subnet Management topic.

Additional good neurons to follow:

  • D-QUORUM (a highly decentralized neuron that follows neurons that have been elected by the NNS)
  • Synapse (currently follows the LORIMER and CodeGov known neurons for Subnet Management, and is a generally well informed known neuron to follow on numerous other topics)
  • WaterNeuron (the WaterNeuron DAO frequently discuss proposals like this in order to vote responsibly based on DAO consensus)

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.