Subnet Management - bkfrj (European)

Proposal 137092 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Intention to offboard C12 provider nodes, discussion here

  • Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient is worse than current!!! :warning:
Node Changes 1 removed, 1 added
Node ID Status Country City Node Provider Data Center Data Center Owner
pekym-jis5l-i3ucx-gujvl-ncj7j-7xk7k-uwwkn-qshzy-z765w-rjwdn-aqetsbrx-uiuyw-pf3h4-bx5i3-daxya-ygait-mnedj-kj574-vsw3u-fwuuz-5qe UP → UNASSIGNED ESCH BarcelonaGeneva Carbon TwelveExtragone SA es1ge2 AdamSafeHost
Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 2 13
City 5 NA 13
Data Center 5 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 13
Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 4.80
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 4 2->CH 2 12
City 5 NA 13
Data Center 5 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.