Subnet Management - 6pbhf (Application)

Governance NNS proposal discussions
, ,
56

Proposal 135993 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES :white_check_mark:

TLDR:
The proposal replaces node in Tbilisi (Asia). Even thought the node seems to be in good health as pointed out by @Lorimer Here that DRE team has already prevented same ownership NP nodes from being active on the subnet. It would be nice to have this as a motion proposal being submitted as record for future keeping.
No issues were found in the nodes or locations proposed and decentralization stats remain the same. I vote to adopt

Provider Changes
Removed Added
George Bassadone Pindar Technology Limited
Location Changes
Removed Added
Asia, Tbilisi 1 Asia, Seoul 3
Nodes Removed 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
xqhoe… UP George Bassadone tb1 Tbilisi 1
Nodes Added 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
td2et… UNASSIGNED Pindar Technology Limited kr1 Seoul 3

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: Node xqhoe…: Remove from Subnet check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node td2et…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

2 Likes