Hi @GeekFactory, further to my other questions, can I ask for some commentary on the process that GeekFactory goes through when reviewing IC-OS proposals (before you vote)?
I noticed that GeekFactory was one of the few named neurons that voted yes on the following IC-OS proposal a few weeks ago → Proposal to elect new release rc–2024-07-18_01-30–github - Governance - Internet Computer Developer Forum (dfinity.org). Note that at least two of the other named neurons that voted yes are known to vote blindly on IC-OS releases. There were very blatant issues with this proposal, which was why it ended up being rejected.
Here’s a screenshot I took of the yes votes at the time when I rejected the proposal.
See here for the final results.
I’m asking this question because StakeGeek is offering financial incentive for users to relinquish their voting power to GeekFactory. GeekFactory claims to take governance seriously. In this context I’d appreciate it if you could shed some light on what happened with GeekFactory’s vote in this case (and how GeekFactory generally handle reviewing IC-OS releases).
Thanks in advance 