Come on man, do you really think this will work at scale? I Don’t know if @Leadership never thought about this, but bad actors will have more and more ways to fake KYC data.
I live in South America, Colombia, I lived in Argentina too, and I know how easy is to fake bank accounts data, fake ID, fake any documents that are currently asked on our KYC to become a node Provider.
Asking @borovan to go and ask for additional information that can also be faked it’s stupid and doesn’t solve this issue from the root, do you think your solution works at scale? How do we plan to
Validate if is real each KYC when this network is running globally, hosting millions of software and users, and millions of subnets?
This issue has to get a REAL solution NOW @dominicwilliams deterministic decentralization just works if you think everyone is a good actor, but reality is we lived in a world full of bad actors, how are we
Solving node providers collusion, validation of node providers KYC.
I think node shuffling could be, but I think the one that solves this “anonymity “ is having ICA in charge of recruiting this node providers in person, I mean to onboard this node providers they have to present itself in person, this association will have to take their biometrics, scan their eyes, fingerprints, and ask them to sign in person a contract where they guarantee that they are the person of the identity on the node provider KYC, and that this identity matches with the person doing the biometrics. @Jan @bjoern @samuelburri
We gotta detect where is the potential threat here, I don’t see it to much on node collusion if the nodes have real ID’s, I see a HUGE threat on the validation process of the IDENTITY of this node providers, because there’s no real solution to validate identity or bank documentation presented on the KYC process and if it matches or not the real identity of the person trying to apply.
I used to feel save having my money on ICP but now o think i will move my fund to ETH.