I’m interested in working on this myself if need be. But first we need to find out what’s involved from the experts here who’ve already worked on the existing integrations.
Can anyone comment on the feasibility of this? It seems like a useful thing to implement since ECDSA is essentially deprecated where compatibility with BTC or ETH signatures is unnecessary.
Hi @justbc, as @domwoe mentioned we are now looking into extending support to threshold Schnorr signatures as well as Ed25519. Supporting Schnorr over Secp256k1 will be easier because we can reuse part of the existing IDKG protocol implemented for ECDSA. Once we have that, adding support for Ed25519 should be comparatively easy, since they are very similar to Schnorr signatures.
I’m glad to hear this implementation is straightforward and on the roadmap.
Is this expected to be done in the next few months or is it further off?
It there a shortage of developer hours to work on this soon, I wouldn’t mind contributing, although I’ll need to get ramped up before being productive.